They're indirect effects. The fact that we could achieve 3rd spot in the table in our first season back in Serie A goes to show that its not direct effects of Calciopoli that caused that. It was decisions to hire Secco and Ranieri but we could just as easily have hired more competent staff. We wouldn't have necessarily lost that much quality if it weren't for big spending on little talent. You say we were broke but we managed to spent over 40M on Melo and Diego alone in one summer and consequently came 7th.
What I'm saying is we could still have been relegated, hired different staff who made better decisions and we would have been in a scudetto winning position instead of coming 7th EVEN THOUGH WE WERE RELEGATED. Understand that? We could have very easily been back on our feet despite being relegated if it weren't for the poor decision making AFTER Serie B which was the cause of our 7th place finishes not Calciopoli.
Let me make it as clear as possible.
We get relegated --> we win Serie B under Deschamps --> Ranieri is hired --> Secco and Ranieri derail us.
But what could have happened despite calciopoli occurring...
We get relegated --> we hire a different GM --> win Serie B --> keep Deschamps or hire someone better --> our more competent GM along with our more competent manager makes the right decisions in the market and we are able to rebuild a competitive squad.
See that the outcome is different for either scenario but they both come from our relegation??
So obviously it was the hiring of incompetent staff that brought us down not Calciopoli directly because we could have easily avoided that crisis despite being relegated had we hired the right people. You know our staff prior to Calciopoli were not the only decent CEO's GMs and managers in the world. There's no reason why we couldn't have gotten someone other than Ranieri and Secco and made a better future for the club.
What I'm saying is we could still have been relegated, hired different staff who made better decisions and we would have been in a scudetto winning position instead of coming 7th EVEN THOUGH WE WERE RELEGATED. Understand that? We could have very easily been back on our feet despite being relegated if it weren't for the poor decision making AFTER Serie B which was the cause of our 7th place finishes not Calciopoli.
Let me make it as clear as possible.
We get relegated --> we win Serie B under Deschamps --> Ranieri is hired --> Secco and Ranieri derail us.
But what could have happened despite calciopoli occurring...
We get relegated --> we hire a different GM --> win Serie B --> keep Deschamps or hire someone better --> our more competent GM along with our more competent manager makes the right decisions in the market and we are able to rebuild a competitive squad.
See that the outcome is different for either scenario but they both come from our relegation??
So obviously it was the hiring of incompetent staff that brought us down not Calciopoli directly because we could have easily avoided that crisis despite being relegated had we hired the right people. You know our staff prior to Calciopoli were not the only decent CEO's GMs and managers in the world. There's no reason why we couldn't have gotten someone other than Ranieri and Secco and made a better future for the club.
If you don't want to admit to that, it's up to you I don't give a shit. Blame it on Secco or your grandma.
inter and Calcioploi are the reason we are fucked.
You're talking "we should've/had we done this, this would happen/we could've"...
I'm talking about what HAS REALLY HAPPENED ALREADY. We've been screwed and you're blaming it on Secco. Please!
