Russia - Ukraine Conflict 2022 (76 Viewers)

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,906
Seriously fuck Russia. Those orcs deserve to be wiped off the face of the earth
to think that they have supporters in usa (or anywhere else for that matter)... imagine the waste of the educational resources if someone doesn't have the decency and the simple understanding of the situation

people's only "excuse" to support russia in this matter is propaganda. if you live in north korea or china, you obviously get a pass. if people have an at least partially free press in their country and they still support russia, then they are a failure
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

GiocataGrande

Commendatore
May 26, 2016
4,073
They'll say that the US is paying candidates, rigging elections, or some other such bullshit.

lol thats exactly what they have been doing tho so i dont understand how you can call it bullshit.

No need to be a Russian/Kremlin propagandist to see that the US is pulling geopolitical strings all over the place:

What you are describing is basically the principles of the old CIA playbook. Divide and conquer. Support and back oppositions to create influence and conflict in other countries. This is blatantly obvious to anyone that has studied any US involvement outside Europe over the years

Be it the Middle East, Eastern Europe or in Asia (especially now that semi conductors are a particular hot topic)

The big difference now however is that the political landscape has drastically changed :

The world going towards multipolarity rather than the old "post colonial" US hedgemony based world order has shuffled things up. The emergence of enormous modern markets in India and China has also changed things a lot.

The US and the Western grip over the world as we have known it for the last 100 years is doomed to fail as other nations and continents starts playing on a more leveled playing field.

This can be seen from so many angles:

Reclaiming of natural resources (African nations started cutting ties and kicking out its old colonial masters) , nations building up its own labour force, more expertize in different sectors (no need for them to rely on the West) the Forming of BRICS, nations such as India becoming main leader of IT and software manufacturing etc . There is a lot to mention here

Anyways, The latest reports i read are now suggesting that sanctions against China is next on the list of considerations. One can only imagine how much that would destabilize markets worldwide and create more tension in an already unstable world.

All i know is i am rooting for a US president or some sort of shift there to show up that would change focus towards fixing things in America and cleaning up their own backyard before going around the world and spreading their "democracy" .

All of this offcourse doesnt excuse Putin or his dirty war in Ukraine. That is a separate issue (in my mind at least).
 

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722

lol thats exactly what they have been doing tho so i dont understand how you can call it bullshit.

No need to be a Russian/Kremlin propagandist to see that the US is pulling geopolitical strings all over the place:

What you are describing is basically the principles of the old CIA playbook. Divide and conquer. Support and back oppositions to create influence and conflict in other countries. This is blatantly obvious to anyone that has studied any US involvement outside Europe over the years

Be it the Middle East, Eastern Europe or in Asia (especially now that semi conductors are a particular hot topic)

The big difference now however is that the political landscape has drastically changed :

The world going towards multipolarity rather than the old "post colonial" US hedgemony based world order has shuffled things up. The emergence of enormous modern markets in India and China has also changed things a lot.

The US and the Western grip over the world as we have known it for the last 100 years is doomed to fail as other nations and continents starts playing on a more leveled playing field.

This can be seen from so many angles:

Reclaiming of natural resources (African nations started cutting ties and kicking out its old colonial masters) , nations building up its own labour force, more expertize in different sectors (no need for them to rely on the West) the Forming of BRICS, nations such as India becoming main leader of IT and software manufacturing etc . There is a lot to mention here

Anyways, The latest reports i read are now suggesting that sanctions against China is next on the list of considerations. One can only imagine how much that would destabilize markets worldwide and create more tension in an already unstable world.

All i know is i am rooting for a US president or some sort of shift there to show up that would change focus towards fixing things in America and cleaning up their own backyard before going around the world and spreading their "democracy" .

All of this offcourse doesnt excuse Putin or his dirty war in Ukraine. That is a separate issue (in my mind at least).
Politics is a dirty game. We have our rules in boxing. In politics, no rules. Especially a young democracy like Ukraine. It's more like MMA.

- Vitali Klitschko

- - - Updated - - -

The better you know Russians and their imperialistic nightmare, the more you want to help Ukraine
That's as good a summary of the info-graphics above as I could come up with myself.
 

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,833

lol thats exactly what they have been doing tho so i dont understand how you can call it bullshit.

No need to be a Russian/Kremlin propagandist to see that the US is pulling geopolitical strings all over the place:

What you are describing is basically the principles of the old CIA playbook. Divide and conquer. Support and back oppositions to create influence and conflict in other countries. This is blatantly obvious to anyone that has studied any US involvement outside Europe over the years

Be it the Middle East, Eastern Europe or in Asia (especially now that semi conductors are a particular hot topic)

The big difference now however is that the political landscape has drastically changed :

The world going towards multipolarity rather than the old "post colonial" US hedgemony based world order has shuffled things up. The emergence of enormous modern markets in India and China has also changed things a lot.

The US and the Western grip over the world as we have known it for the last 100 years is doomed to fail as other nations and continents starts playing on a more leveled playing field.

This can be seen from so many angles:

Reclaiming of natural resources (African nations started cutting ties and kicking out its old colonial masters) , nations building up its own labour force, more expertize in different sectors (no need for them to rely on the West) the Forming of BRICS, nations such as India becoming main leader of IT and software manufacturing etc . There is a lot to mention here

Anyways, The latest reports i read are now suggesting that sanctions against China is next on the list of considerations. One can only imagine how much that would destabilize markets worldwide and create more tension in an already unstable world.

All i know is i am rooting for a US president or some sort of shift there to show up that would change focus towards fixing things in America and cleaning up their own backyard before going around the world and spreading their "democracy" .

All of this offcourse doesnt excuse Putin or his dirty war in Ukraine. That is a separate issue (in my mind at least).
My comment was specifically in reference to:
Even anti US/EU brigade has to wonder why are countries of eastern block flocking to join EU and NATO as to get as far away as possible from Russians and their sphere of influence.
You don"t need to influence an election for that, it's pretty clear.
 

kappa96

Senior Member
Jun 20, 2018
7,475
i see. My bad for taking your post in the wrong context.

I would also agree that anti Russian/Soviet sentiments has existed for a long time in that part of the world and way before the US starting to interfere in elections
Lol, US interfering in elections?
You want us to take you serious after that statement?

You probably wanted to say that the US interfered, in preventing russia to interfere in a bunch of elections, but some blind hatred prevents you from doing so.
 
Last edited:

GiocataGrande

Commendatore
May 26, 2016
4,073
Lol, US interfering in elections?
You want us to take you serious after that statement?

You probably wanted to say that the US interfered, in preventing russia to interfere in a bunch of elections, but some blind hatred prevents you from doing so.

Lol, US interfering in elections?
You want us to take you serious after that statement?

You probably wanted to say that the US interfered, in preventing russia to interfere in a bunch of elections, but some blind hatred prevents you from doing so.
Yes indeed.

Wether you choose to take me or my statement serious or not is none of my concern. What was done in Ukraine could be justified, but the problem is that this instance is far from unique. It has been done many times in so many countries .

I simply described a geopolitical tendency from the biggest geopolitical player history has ever seen.

What justification one might come up for this behavior was not the point.
 

kappa96

Senior Member
Jun 20, 2018
7,475
Yes indeed.

Wether you choose to take me or my statement serious or not is none of my concern. What was done in Ukraine could be justified, but the problem is that this instance is far from unique. It has been done many times in so many countries .

I simply described a geopolitical tendency from the biggest geopolitical player history has ever seen.

What justification one might come up for this behavior was not the point.
What was done in Ukraine, with your own words pls?
 

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,923
Last edited:

GiocataGrande

Commendatore
May 26, 2016
4,073
What was done in Ukraine, with your own words pls?
Not sure what you are trying to do here but , I'll entertain your leading question with an answer.

I will however expect you to bring a reasonable argument to the table going forwaerd instead of baseless claims that my observations come from some sort of Deep hate towards the US. That is beyond childish and just boring.

What we are disussing here is politics and power,and has nothing to do with my personal preference. Lets make that clear.

When it comes to your question i would say that it is obvious that the US and Victoria Nuland had a lot if involvement and interest in the elections of Ukraine from 2014 and going forward. As described by her in the video i posted earlier , they actively searched for a canditate that was susceptible and in favour of US foreign policy and also doing this while bypassing the EU. I would call that the very definiton of meddling in foreign elections.

Some call this "democracy assistance" and in this case it very well could be , but thinking that this practice troughout history has always been done for higher morals is just naive.
 

kappa96

Senior Member
Jun 20, 2018
7,475
Not sure what you are trying to do here but , I'll entertain your leading question with an answer.

I will however expect you to bring a reasonable argument to the table going forwaerd instead of baseless claims that my observations come from some sort of Deep hate towards the US. That is beyond childish and just boring.

What we are disussing here is politics and power,and has nothing to do with my personal preference. Lets make that clear.

When it comes to your question i would say that it is obvious that the US and Victoria Nuland had a lot if involvement and interest in the elections of Ukraine from 2014 and going forward. As described by her in the video i posted earlier , they actively searched for a canditate that was susceptible and in favour of US foreign policy and also doing this while bypassing the EU. I would call that the very definiton of meddling in foreign elections.

Some call this "democracy assistance" and in this case it very well could be , but thinking that this practice troughout history has always been done for higher morals is just naive.
So, what you are saying that the Ukrainians didn't want a pro democracy or pro EU government.
It was the US that made them vote for that, when they could have easily vetoed to stay under the loving heel of mother russia?

Probably that's why they are fighting so hard for their country.
Becaue deep down they love russia so much.

PS what nulland want is besides the point
The only thing that matters is what Ukrainians want and they want the US, NATO and the EU, in spite of what a retarded dictator think they want.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 55)