You just said a transcripted rape recording reads like weird role play.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Buy on AliExpress.com
Premier League 2023-24 (23 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Status
Buy on AliExpress.com
This is what I find troubling, someone willing to get 'abused' and do things against your will just to be financially secure? no thats fucked up and shes a stupid cunt for it if that's her intentions
- - - Updated - - -
and yet we signed Adrian Mutu who was on drugs and accused of beating his own wife in 2003... Just sayin'
- - - Updated - - -
and yet we signed Adrian Mutu who was on drugs and accused of beating his own wife in 2003... Just sayin'
I can recall for a few days now you talking about him. This was a suggestion, despite Berardi consistently having numbers over his career that Greenwood could dream of.
This is not. This is a concious and deliberate effort to defend him and excuse him.
I'm going to give you some unsolicited advice here. You don't know me, you don't have to take it, but it's ok to admit that you were wrong about something. You don't have to double down, that just makes it worse for yourself. No one's going to give you shit for it, and if they do then fuck them.
This is not. This is a concious and deliberate effort to defend him and excuse him.
I'm going to give you some unsolicited advice here. You don't know me, you don't have to take it, but it's ok to admit that you were wrong about something. You don't have to double down, that just makes it worse for yourself. No one's going to give you shit for it, and if they do then fuck them.
you like many are going by some transcript of an audio to claim he is a rapist.
Man utd and the courts think otherwise for whatever reason and based on the evidence they have in both their investigations, it's not about me or you being wrong, I'm looking at the facts here, if you're so certain of his guilt based on this then can I ask you why Man utd have come out to defend his innocence in their statement? It seems to me they're letting him go in fear of a public backlash rather than thinking that he's guilty of his crimes given how long their internal investigation took to conclude, and yes they'd have all the available evidence to analyse including this audio.
- - - Updated - - -
The transcript was enough thanks. But like I said in all seriousness why are man utd coming out defending his actions, they will have seen and heard everything in their own investigations.
Man utd and the courts think otherwise for whatever reason and based on the evidence they have in both their investigations, it's not about me or you being wrong, I'm looking at the facts here, if you're so certain of his guilt based on this then can I ask you why Man utd have come out to defend his innocence in their statement? It seems to me they're letting him go in fear of a public backlash rather than thinking that he's guilty of his crimes given how long their internal investigation took to conclude, and yes they'd have all the available evidence to analyse including this audio.
- - - Updated - - -
The transcript was enough thanks. But like I said in all seriousness why are man utd coming out defending his actions, they will have seen and heard everything in their own investigations.
Last edited:
Ah fuck it I'll bite
"Why were man United going to keep him"
Because they're a big business. Their employee worth tens of millions of pounds was cleared in the courts. They don't give two shits about morals they care about balance sheets. Now they have to lose a prospect for pennies.
"Oh so he is innocent then!"
Again, your gold digging partner deciding not to prosecute you doesn't mean you're fucking innocent. NOBODY is trying to say that recording is out of context or faked, but it's not enough to convict him. He's literally in the audio RAPING her.
If I shoot somebody on the street & you're the only person who can place me there and you decide you'd be better off saying nothing, chances are I am not getting prosecuted. Am I innocent?
Until somebody comes out with proof that the recording is fake news, he's just a millionaire who got away with rape.
"Why were man United going to keep him"
Because they're a big business. Their employee worth tens of millions of pounds was cleared in the courts. They don't give two shits about morals they care about balance sheets. Now they have to lose a prospect for pennies.
"Oh so he is innocent then!"
Again, your gold digging partner deciding not to prosecute you doesn't mean you're fucking innocent. NOBODY is trying to say that recording is out of context or faked, but it's not enough to convict him. He's literally in the audio RAPING her.
If I shoot somebody on the street & you're the only person who can place me there and you decide you'd be better off saying nothing, chances are I am not getting prosecuted. Am I innocent?
Until somebody comes out with proof that the recording is fake news, he's just a millionaire who got away with rape.
Ok I get the first part and I agree, but what I'm asking is if man utd have already decided to let him go for pennies/free on the back of what seems influenced by a public back lash but at the same time defended his actions and innocence in the charges brought against him, why even mention it if the evidence is as clear and apparent as it supposedly is. I don't see what benefits man utd get from even stating that, it wasn't necessary but yet they deemed it so off the back of their own investigation.
You keep saying shit like "supposedly"
It's a fucking recording bro that nobody is claiming is fake.
You seem to not understand that being cleared of a charge doesn't mean you're innocent it means they don't have enough to go forward with the case.
If you listen to the audio which AGAIN nobody is claiming to be faked, it's the literal textbook definition of a fucking rape. I did not write the countries laws.
It's a fucking recording bro that nobody is claiming is fake.
You seem to not understand that being cleared of a charge doesn't mean you're innocent it means they don't have enough to go forward with the case.
If you listen to the audio which AGAIN nobody is claiming to be faked, it's the literal textbook definition of a fucking rape. I did not write the countries laws.
Well I'm saying supposedly because like I keep reiterating Man utd in their own investigation which took months to conclude don't seem to share your sentiment. I'm not claiming the audio is fake, but does that mean to say off the back of Man utd's official statement that they think otherwise? Like I said there's contradictions that don't add up, I get what you're saying about his girlfriend being a gold digger or so you believe but again that won't have influenced the wording behind Man utd's statement.
Why does it matter at all what Manchester United do? Why do you keep falling back on that?
@Pirlo's Beard already shot down the court decision. Or do you for some reason need examples of other rich people/athletes getting away with things?
@Pirlo's Beard already shot down the court decision. Or do you for some reason need examples of other rich people/athletes getting away with things?
of course it matters! they say he's innocent of the charges, you say otherwise. The fact is they carried out their own independent investigation which has lead to their own conclusion as highlighted in their statement.
Somehow you have debunked the case over an audio recording, man utd have spent months analysing the evidence and after months of investigating say otherwise.
Somehow you have debunked the case over an audio recording, man utd have spent months analysing the evidence and after months of investigating say otherwise.
- Status