Premier League 2023-24 (19 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Status
BTW this amazing man united investigation you keep going back to was a staff member having a talk with the girls mum and concluding everything was OK
Her family wanted it dropped because they're parasites too.
Go to a United forum and read from people following the case. Their own fucking fans are disgusted with how it was handled.
Her family wanted it dropped because they're parasites too.
Go to a United forum and read from people following the case. Their own fucking fans are disgusted with how it was handled.
>Girl posts audio of her being forced into having sex. Nobody has denied the credibility of the audio.
>girls family are parasites, pressure girl into dropping case
>Club who don't want to lose asset visit girls family, not even the girl herself, and are assured everything is OK
>Club are happy. Courts don't have enough to go on as pics & audio aren't enough
If you seen somebody get murdered but had no proof and the courts said it didn't happen would you gaslight yourself into believing that? Jesus fuck the mental gymnastics.
>girls family are parasites, pressure girl into dropping case
>Club who don't want to lose asset visit girls family, not even the girl herself, and are assured everything is OK
>Club are happy. Courts don't have enough to go on as pics & audio aren't enough
If you seen somebody get murdered but had no proof and the courts said it didn't happen would you gaslight yourself into believing that? Jesus fuck the mental gymnastics.
“Our process commenced in February 2023, following all charges against Mason being dropped. Throughout, we have taken into account the wishes, rights and perspective of the alleged victim along with the club’s standards and values, and sought to collate as much information and context as possible. This has required us to proceed with sensitivity and care to obtain evidence not in the public domain, including from those with direct knowledge of the case."
Right well this says to me that this 6 month long investigation was more than a club staff member visiting the girl's family
Yes you do, it would signal it clear to you what an absolute scumbag you sticking up for.
He is super rich so his gf is fine with the abuse in afterhand and had a child with him. Dropped the claims and he doesnt get legal complications.
But the incident itself both reads and and sounds like clear abuse. A pompous dirtbag who couldn't accept no. We should not want to have anything to do with him. Let the classless dumbass be someone else problem.
ok well lets just leave it here. I find Man utd's statement to contradict a lot of what has been said here, that's not to say I agree with it, but I find it baffling at the same time because it seems to me that something that is as obvious and as clear cut in the audio/transcript you post what would take Man utd 6 months to conclude whilst having the resources to question the parties involved as well as having access to the available evidence to conclude that they feel he's innocent of the charges brought against him.
My suggestion about looking at him as an alternative is based off the back of that, I still don't understand why man utd would come out with such statement if they were absolutely certain of their wording, when they're not going to benefit financially if they are going to release him anyways.
But fine lets just draw a line in this and move on.
My suggestion about looking at him as an alternative is based off the back of that, I still don't understand why man utd would come out with such statement if they were absolutely certain of their wording, when they're not going to benefit financially if they are going to release him anyways.
But fine lets just draw a line in this and move on.
It's a really simple case
Is the recording real? (The defence never tried to debunk it, so it is)
If Yes
That is literally, and I can't stress literally enough, rape.
EVERYTHING else, the club, the courts, the prosecution & defence is about wether they have enough evidence to convict him for a pattern of abuse. A key witness dropped out, so they don't. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with innocence.
If you listen to that recording & perform mental gymnastics about everything else that happened after then you're defending rape.
Man Uniteds statement means absolutely fuck all. They wanted him back but it got leaked so they're running defence. The alternative is "yeah we think he's a piece of shit but you guys seem upset about that so we're letting him go"
Is the recording real? (The defence never tried to debunk it, so it is)
If Yes
That is literally, and I can't stress literally enough, rape.
EVERYTHING else, the club, the courts, the prosecution & defence is about wether they have enough evidence to convict him for a pattern of abuse. A key witness dropped out, so they don't. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with innocence.
If you listen to that recording & perform mental gymnastics about everything else that happened after then you're defending rape.
Man Uniteds statement means absolutely fuck all. They wanted him back but it got leaked so they're running defence. The alternative is "yeah we think he's a piece of shit but you guys seem upset about that so we're letting him go"
Man utds statement doesnt mean fuck all if they somehow believe the audio "doesn't paint the full picture" as they put it, again I'm not discrediting the audio but clearly man utd don't feel it's enough to prove his charges as you so strongly believe. The Club share/stakeholders will look at this and form an opinion of this don't forget, so the statement has to be spot on for their sake.
Anyways like I said lets just draw a line on this we've all said our piece now.
Anyways like I said lets just draw a line on this we've all said our piece now.
- Status