Didn't Ambrosini only get a one-match ban for going to speak to the ref at halftime in a game this season (presumably to try and influence him to be more favourable to Milan in the second half)?
Why has Nedved got a longer ban than that for something that I would consider less serious?
because as a director he is supposed to be more mature then a player, and should be even more a role model to others.
Its also, alot less serious to have a director banned, who has no influence on the field, then an actual player.
FIGC also knows ambrosini isnt the brightest lad ever, and took that into consideration when deciding the ban.
I like nedved tremendously, but as a director, you cant do this.