Paulo Dybala (177 Viewers)

[Juvellino]

Pls no clause :xfinger:

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Hydde]

no clause is good clause

 

[Satchy]

Santa clause?

 

[Zacheryah]

??

2/3? days of meltdown over a clause that was never there

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

2/3? days of meltdown over a clause that was never there

The meaning of meltdown has become very diluted these days on Tuz. We rarely have meltdowns these days.

 

[Juvellino]

The meaning of meltdown has become very diluted these days on Tuz. We rarely have meltdowns these days.

Even Pogba wasn't much of a meltdown. Vidal on the other hand....

 

[campionesidd]

Release clauses are rubbish, I'm glad we don't have them for most of our players.

 

[amir3323]

I am eagerly anticipating the "melt-down" that will go down when he signs his new deal with no buy-out clause.

"Marotta should have added a buy-out clause!"
"This means Marotta will get low-balled and sell him for only 20 million!"
"He will leave this summer anyway!"
"His 7 million wage is half of what EPL clubs offer!"

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Even Pogba wasn't much of a meltdown. Vidal on the other hand....

Or Conte's resignation followed by the hiring of the yes-man Allegri

 

[Epic]

In theory the release clause benefits only the player, as the club cannot refuse an offer matching the clause.

In practice, however, a very high release clause is used by the clubs to their advantage. Firstly, it deters other clubs from pursuing the player. Secondly, it is used in negotiations, where the club says to the player and the potential buyer: "look, this is the price that we agreed with the player and there is no way he could move for any less". And since the player has already accepted the valuation set in his release clause, the pressure is on the buyer to match it, and not on the seller to lower it.

The only question is if 150 mln is not a tad too low in today's market. On the other hand, if Dybala is worth 150 mln, we will have to renegotiate his contract anyway.

 

[Juvellino]

Or Conte's resignation followed by the hiring of the yes-man Allegri

I was a lurker at the time but that one was fun

 

[Fr3sh]

Or Conte's resignation followed by the hiring of the yes-man Allegri

Yeah
I was furious
And now I think is the GOAT

 

[CrimsonianKing]

Or Conte's resignation followed by the hiring of the yes-man Allegri

Damn. Even I melted down then. I hated Allegri because of his persistence in mentioning Il Gol di Muntari

 

[Hængebøffer]

Damn. Even I melted down then. I hated Allegri because of his persistence in mentioning Il Gol di Muntari

I mentioned it before, but, considerring the obvious bias, it seems like people behave in this club's environment. Even Bendtner wasn't acting like a twat.

 

[DAiDEViL]

So, is there a clause or not?

 

[lgorTudor]

150 mil is more than twice as much as we'll get for him in 2018. I hope the clause is happening.

 

[Nzoric]

No, we shouldn't. We build around our best players, not deprive the squad of their presence. We aren't a Dortmund or an Atletico Madrid.

150m. We can get any player in the world to replace him and have change to spend on a few atalanta players

 

[Hængebøffer]

150m. We can get any player in the world to replace him and have change to spend on a few atalanta players

We shouldn't sell out from attack. We finally got what we lacked, but now we miss the physical presence in midfield. It was the other way around a couple of seasons ago.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

Santa clause?

Sanity clause

 

[Nzoric]

We shouldn't sell out from attack. We finally got what we lacked, but now we miss the physical presence in midfield. It was the other way around a couple of seasons ago.

Id love it if he stayed. But really, I only posted to underline how ridiculous it is to argue whether or not there should ve a 150m clause. If someone puts up that kind of money he is gone regardless.