Paulo Dybala (161 Viewers)

Legend or Rookie? ***non-official poll***


  • Total voters
    140
  • Poll closed .

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,985
Not true at all. He would be by far their best option for that position still and they have missed him a lot this season.

And they didn't let him go easily. They wanted to keep him but he decided it was the time to move on.

We are a really huge team that has survived a big financial and reputational hit after Calciopoli. We have kept going forward each year and the team (players and management) are very confident in their abilities to reach important objectives. It's some of the fans that have failed to keep up mentally and are still swimming in a big ocean of self doubt for some reason. I'll promise that if these fans at some point find their way to the shore they'll discover it's not a year 2010 anymore.
You can say this snipe goes 2 ways because, as much we a have gone forward from 2010 ad the calciopoli times, we still need to demonstrate we can keep our stars. If this requirement is not met, theres no place to call some fans´s doubt unjustified.

Still, in my case, i dot not demand this because i know where we are. Some people do not. The moggi times are long gone.
 

PhRoZeN

Livin with Mediocre
Mar 29, 2006
16,930
That release clause doesnt mean much when a player decides he wants to go. Because we cant force him to stay and when its public he wants out then we cant negotiate a good sell on deal either. Maybe its a good thing because we can atleast this way cut the crap and get the 150 and adios. Seriously i got no issues with this release clause, it probably does show where Dybala's long term commitments are but were Juve, we can do forward planning and get the next one. As long as Dybala doesnt end up at Union alongside dab hoe, im ok with this.
 

digitalbash

Senior Member
Dec 19, 2013
1,421
150M is his market value for summer 2017 lol. If he plays god level, we need to bump him up to 9M/Year and 220M release clause. Regardless, 150,000,000,000 cash for a player sounds like good business.
 

Hydde

Minimiliano Tristelli
Mar 6, 2003
38,985
Big clubs don't do this. And it would mean we are seen as a stepping stone.
I don't care if it's 100, 150 or 200m, we should NOT agree to this. Juve is not Napoli or Torino.
But when the time comes to show power to retain him, we lack the funds the big 3 have.

Traditionally, we are as big as Barcelona, madrid and Bayern... but in sheer economical power we are behind. Thats why we cant simply say "no clause, you are juvebound".

There are really big offers outside of italy. We can talk as much as we want of how great Juve is... but if other teams show Dybala stupid offers, we need to do the same to show him we are able to compete. If this requirement is not met, he needs to make it sure to add a clause in case a better offer arrives and he is willing to listen. Otherwise he would close doors just for the sake of the "spirito juve".

He can like being here, but if in a couple years he grows even bigger and clubs come doubling his salary , he MUST consider those offers. No one can force him to stay here,and if we force him, is because we have the spending power to simply say no and up his salary.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 137)