Nicolò Rovella (10 Viewers)
- Thread starter JuveJay
- Start date
Except they are being loaned currently, with Lazio taking their wages (as far as we know) and the purchase not happening until next year. So this year we pay no wages and wash 1 year from their book value. Then next year the transfer officially occurs on a permanent basis and their books values being one year less. I believe in the end both will be a plusvalenza.
Half the price?
Are you guys for real?
When was the last time a starter from a relegation candidate was sold for 17 million or more in Seria A.
I'll wait.
Yeah, yeah I know ,sentimental value ,but I doubt that guintoli received ,like 35 million from somewhere but nah he decided to sell to nazio for 17 because reasons.
Are you guys for real?
When was the last time a starter from a relegation candidate was sold for 17 million or more in Seria A.
I'll wait.
Yeah, yeah I know ,sentimental value ,but I doubt that guintoli received ,like 35 million from somewhere but nah he decided to sell to nazio for 17 because reasons.
‘Wash’ 1 year from book value? Assuming the option isn’t triggered within this year, wash means -5m amortization this year to recognize +5m plusvalenza next year. It’s lame shifting the earning to next year but expense this year, net impact is 0. Not that useful either if this year revenue would be lower without CL than revenue next year maybe with CL.
I don't think we've ever let a promising youngster go, then he became good and made us regret that decision. At least in this department, the club seems to get it right all the time.
On top of that, we are loaded with young talent as never before, so I don't mind seeing someone getting sold. Especially if the funds will let us keep our best players and not be desperate for that Lukaku swap shit.
On top of that, we are loaded with young talent as never before, so I don't mind seeing someone getting sold. Especially if the funds will let us keep our best players and not be desperate for that Lukaku swap shit.
Our way of doing business is plusvalenza, but in the Italian way. Value destruction. It's all about book value, not real value. So we go to the store and buy something nice, a wine that will age and grow in value. We got it for 1000 euro. Some time later we decide to profit on this wine, so we sell it for 700 euro since we have amortized it. We never make net profit. One day a friend comes by and suggest we put the money in the bank with interest rate. We laugh at the friend. We point and laugh. As if money grows on trees, we yell while holding our guts. As if value could increase, we scream and tumble down. Everyone knows you destroy value, you don't add value.
Unless it kids, you say while holding a finger out, kids you can make ton of money from but you oughta knick then when they're young!
Sent from my Samsung via Tapatalk
Unless it kids, you say while holding a finger out, kids you can make ton of money from but you oughta knick then when they're young!
Sent from my Samsung via Tapatalk
Yeah I was never satisfied with this amortization shit, although I get it from an accounting perspective. Other clubs sell their players higher than they got them for, you know, the old fashioned way. We are happy if it's not recorded as a loss in the books.
Anyway that's enough complaining from me for the week.
Anyway that's enough complaining from me for the week.
