Nicolò Rovella (6 Viewers)

[Juvellino]

Henry was a massive mistake. Coman was a small one. Fuck Cuntobile.

We could have at least made more money off Immobile. He’s 8th all time in Serie A goals.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Adrian]

Absolute fuckwits! They can all go fuck their mums in the ass!

 

[da_ledgeaun]

I was so excited to see him back in our team, and then they do this, fuuck max..! we should have just let him stay in Monza for another season..

Sent from my I2212 using Tapatalk

 

[PhRoZeN]

Both Miretti and Nicolussi should be loaned out ahead of Rovella. He got injured so what, he's far from injury prone. We're gonna regret this one.

 

[s4tch]

agreed with most of you, i would have liked to see him getting a chance and i also think that the price is pretty low. we could have used a pure regista, he's not really a versatile player, his passing still has good potential.

but let's not pretend we sold a starter who can be relied on from day 1. his injury record is a bit alarming to say the least. and it's not like jj ruined him instantly, he had multiple muscle injuries at genoa too.

 

[singus]

People actually believed in any of these Fagcolis, Mirotti and Ravolla?
Good riddance

 

[JuveJay]

People actually believed in any of these Fagcolis, Mirotti and Ravolla?
Good riddance

Good young player but not very versatile and questionable injury record, seems to be the consensus.

Also, if Caicedo is worth 125m then we should get at least 35m for Rovella, because that's how transfers work.

 

[Powis]

People actually believed in any of these Fagcolis, Mirotti and Ravolla?
Good riddance

Yeah, they're overhyped as hell for most of the time. Rovella will probably be Marco Parola quality of player and that's about it.

I gave up getting excited about young talent after we couldn't hear the end of how good Caldara was and how big of a mistake was to let him go.

 

[MikeM]

Problem is selling to Lazio and Sarri. He will make 500 passes a match and his stock will skyrocket.

 

[ilmetronome]

Yea most of italian youngster are overrated, but unlike the britbong they aren't overpriced. Espescially this current time when italian club suffer financially after covid.
Unless epl team come for them, it's hard to put higher price tag.

 

[AFL_ITALIA]

People actually believed in any of these Fagcolis, Mirotti and Ravolla?
Good riddance

Sure let's drop another €30M on a new bench player with higher wages, we have the money for it.

 

[DAiDEViL]

Sure let's drop another €30M on a new bench player with higher wages, we have the money for it.

This. Finally we have some young players on low wages, good enough to be at least rotation players, and people want to sell them.

 

[.zero]

agreed with most of you, i would have liked to see him getting a chance and i also think that the price is pretty low. we could have used a pure regista, he's not really a versatile player, his passing still has good potential.

but let's not pretend we sold a starter who can be relied on from day 1. his injury record is a bit alarming to say the least. and it's not like jj ruined him instantly, he had multiple muscle injuries at genoa too.

22 days due to an ‘unknown injury’

also is ‘abdominal influenza’ the medical term for a stomach flu

 

[Espectro]

Listen if we determine that we do the need the kid or if we need to “sell” to “keep Chiesa and Vlahovic” I understand…

what I don’t understand is the price tag, the fact that we sell him to Lazio and that they seems to dictate the details of the deal in their favor… AND WE ACCEPT!!

Getting 21M for both Rovella and Pellegrini is pulling down or pants to Lotito and say “Hey, want to join the party? Gravina and Ceferin like it!”

 

[singus]

Sure let's drop another €30M on a new bench player with higher wages, we have the money for it.

They can be decent bench players for a mid table Serie A team, thats correct. Nothing to be overly excited about.

 

[Espectro]

They can be decent bench players for a mid table Serie A team, thats correct. Nothing to be overly excited about.

so… Juventus

 

[Bjerknes]

agreed with most of you, i would have liked to see him getting a chance and i also think that the price is pretty low. we could have used a pure regista, he's not really a versatile player, his passing still has good potential.

but let's not pretend we sold a starter who can be relied on from day 1. his injury record is a bit alarming to say the least. and it's not like jj ruined him instantly, he had multiple muscle injuries at genoa too.

The bad karma started as soon as he signed for JJ. I’m sure he’ll be fine now.

 

[s4tch]

The bad karma started as soon as he signed for JJ. I’m sure he’ll be fine now.

i'm genuinely curious to see

if lazio can use him for 30-40 matches per season then good for them

 

[Mokku]

I'm watching Tonali put on a masterclass for Newcastle and I can't help wonder if Rovella is given the chance, could develop into something more. Instead of him, we've gone through numerous failures like McKennie, Zakaria, Paredes, Pogba, and Miretti. Had we got Barella, we'd just pass loan him out instead of developing him.

 

[U Picciriddu]

I'm watching Tonali put on a masterclass for Newcastle and I can't help wonder if Rovella is given the chance, could develop into something more. Instead of him, we've gone through numerous failures like McKennie, Zakaria, Paredes, Pogba, and Miretti. Had we got Barella, we'd just pass loan him out instead of developing him.

Milan created value. Bought cheap, accepted him a year struggling, gave him the time to grow and made a nice profit.

Wether they should’ve sold or not is another discussion but this is a prime example of how we should run this club.