Nick Against the World (38 Viewers)

The Pado

Filthy Gobbo
Jul 12, 2002
9,939
You know, Ze, that makes me wonder.

Imagine that same officer went up to Vinman and didn't give him a ticket, not because he's a fellow police officer, but because he's also not Arabian.

Would that still be okay?
WE HAVE A WINNER!!

Dumbest fucking post of the year . . . but it's only June. Six more months for Shit-For-Brains to top himself. :disagree:
 

The Pado

Filthy Gobbo
Jul 12, 2002
9,939
@ Seven - A better example is the cop who catches the 15-year old kid drawing a moustache and beard on the Bebe girl at the bus stop. Public vandalism is an illegal act, but rather than hauling the kid off to jail for the night, the cop brings the kid straight home to his parents. Should that cop be fired for abuse of power?

Your thing is to point out how unitelligent Vinman is, but at one time he said that you lacked the capacity to do what he does. That you could not be a cop. I'm sure that you responde with something witty like, "yes, I'm not dumb enough", but your latest posts prove that Vinman recognized something in you that now clearly demonstrates that you do lack the capacity.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,332
WE HAVE A WINNER!!

Dumbest fucking post of the year . . . but it's only June. Six more months for Shit-For-Brains to top himself. :disagree:
I expect better from you, Pado, from you as well Ze.

You see, the point isn't that what that cop did is related to racism. However, it's the same sort of discrimination. Why did he not give a ticket to Vin? Because he's a police officer. So he doesn't give a ticket because it's Vinman.

You see where that is just as wrong as racism? Dear god, you really have to explain everything to some of you. A monkey could have understood what I was trying to say.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,332
@ Seven - A better example is the cop who catches the 15-year old kid drawing a moustache and beard on the Bebe girl at the bus stop. Public vandalism is an illegal act, but rather than hauling the kid off to jail for the night, the cop brings the kid straight home to his parents. Should that cop be fired for abuse of power?

Your thing is to point out how unitelligent Vinman is, but at one time he said that you lacked the capacity to do what he does. That you could not be a cop. I'm sure that you responde with something witty like, "yes, I'm not dumb enough", but your latest posts prove that Vinman recognized something in you that now clearly demonstrates that you do lack the capacity.
This is just cheap. You're trying to point out my false analogy by making one yourself? Mine is right, yours is wrong. And here is why:

the cop you're talking about would have acted the same way towards any 15 year old. The cop Vinman is talking about wouldn't have acted the same towards all other guys if they had done what Vinman did. He didn't give him a ticket because Vin's a police officer.

Not to mention the complete loss of image here. A cop is supposed to be 100% clean. That includes things like these. You can't have law enforcers pulling stuff like this.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,332
This is why, like I said, people like you need guidance from people like me. In the end we will have to decide what you need to examine and where we want to with the results of your tests.
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
I expect better from you, Pado, from you as well Ze.

You see, the point isn't that what that cop did is related to racism. However, it's the same sort of discrimination. Why did he not give a ticket to Vin? Because he's a police officer. So he doesn't give a ticket because it's Vinman.

You see where that is just as wrong as racism? Dear god, you really have to explain everything to some of you. A monkey could have understood what I was trying to say.
It has nothing to do with racism, you just look at everything like it is the same, it isn't.

This is just cheap. You're trying to point out my false analogy by making one yourself? Mine is right, yours is wrong. And here is why:

the cop you're talking about would have acted the same way towards any 15 year old. The cop Vinman is talking about wouldn't have acted the same towards all other guys if they had done what Vinman did. He didn't give him a ticket because Vin's a police officer.

Not to mention the complete loss of image here. A cop is supposed to be 100% clean. That includes things like these. You can't have law enforcers pulling stuff like this.
He would have if they were all cops. Whick is why the analogy works, ya dumbass.
This is why, like I said, people like you need guidance from people like me. In the end we will have to decide what you need to examine and where we want to with the results of your tests.
You sound like Hitler, you fucking good-for-nothing-jewkiller.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,332
ßömßäяdîëя;1367382 said:
It has nothing to do with racism, you just look at everything like it is the same, it isn't.


He would have if they were all cops. Whick is why the analogy works, ya dumbass.
Whether you like it or not racism is a form of discrimination. And so is this. The analogy doesn't work, because apparently a certain part of the population is immune to getting traffic tickets.

Age however, is something completely different. At the dawn of our civilization we agreed that age could indeed have an impact on laws. We chose to act differently towards minors. You could say that the population is split in two according to the law.

We never agreed about police officers forming a third group. They fall in the adult category and should be judged as such. If they are not, that's discrimination. My oh my, you guys really don't have a clue.

PS: Hitler wasn't a technocrat. In the end he was a dictator. I don't expect you to know the difference as you're nothing more than a baboon with the ability to speak.
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
Whether you like it or not racism is a form of discrimination. And so is this. The analogy doesn't work, because apparently a certain part of the population is immune to getting traffic tickets.

Age however, is something completely different. At the dawn of our civilization we agreed that age could indeed have an impact on laws. We chose to act differently towards minors. You could say that the population is split in two according to the law.

We never agreed about police officers forming a third group. They fall in the adult category and should be judged as such. If they are not, that's discrimination. My oh my, you guys really don't have a clue.

PS: Hitler wasn't a technocrat. In the end he was a dictator. I don't expect you to know the difference as you're nothing more than a baboon with the ability to speak.
Aren't we all baboons?

And, by the way, I want to beat your ass and kill your mother and brother.

Then eat their dead bodies with hot sauce and pickles.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,332
Burke's life in three steps:

1. He tries to debate
2. He understands he's not going to win the debate any time soon
3. He starts throwing dirt
 
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
Hector, I don't try to debate you at all. I just think you are so far idiotic and egotistical that no matter what i say, you will not understand me, and that's fine. Persons who are able to really debate lie in the median of free thinking. You lie so far one way, it is not possible to debate, you make everyone try to think like you, and it's dumb, childish, and to be honest, it is unrealistic. You would be at home in the Library at Alexandria trying to invent the water wheel or design the Colossus of Rhodes. In the Pantheon thinking of the philosophy behind the "Giant Spaghetti Monster." But you don't live in ancient Greece. You live now, so your only true aspiration is to be the next David Koresh.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 38)