Nick Against the World (44 Viewers)
- Thread starter IncuboRossonero
- Start date
In fact, the football gods were on Milan's side all night long, and their names were Cafu, Maldini, Nesta and Stam. Nothing that is said can take away from Liverpool's achievement. Sure, they played Catenaccio, but in all honesty, i dont see anything wrong with it. In the second half, Liverpool got the three goals, and played within their limitations from thereon. They were intelligent enough to realise the mistakes they made in the first half, and were well aware of how vulnerable they were on the counter.
And like I've said before, Milan, probably should just thank their stars they were even in the final, because as much as i wanted them to win the cup after Juve were sent packing; they did little to deserve it in the semis. Where they were thoroughly outplayed in two legs of football by PSV Eindhoven, who were by far the more deserving candidates for the final.
And like I've said before, Milan, probably should just thank their stars they were even in the final, because as much as i wanted them to win the cup after Juve were sent packing; they did little to deserve it in the semis. Where they were thoroughly outplayed in two legs of football by PSV Eindhoven, who were by far the more deserving candidates for the final.
I was cheering for Liverpool, gray. Nonetheless, it simply wasn't a goal. Sheva's goal in the final against Juve was disallowed for this reason. I think Milan was pretty much robbed on wednesday, BUT they should thank themselves anyway. They were too arrogant and therefore lost the game. Liverpool was just aided a bit by refereeing errors. Like Dudek coming out of his goal with every single penalty for example.
OP
I think you don't really understand the term FOOTBALL GODS...think WEATHER GODS....etc. you are thinking of legends...different.
P.S. Your right..nothing is wrong with catenaccio..until an Italian does it and it is then dubbed "anti-football".
They lost one game out of 6 including the second round against Man U; Inter and PSV....
Did you watch them apart from the one game they lost against PSV or are you just basing it on that..
please explain to me how a team that wins 5 games and allows NO GOALS in those FIVE GAMES and loses ONE does not deserve to be in the final...
P.S. Your right..nothing is wrong with catenaccio..until an Italian does it and it is then dubbed "anti-football".
They lost one game out of 6 including the second round against Man U; Inter and PSV....
Did you watch them apart from the one game they lost against PSV or are you just basing it on that..
please explain to me how a team that wins 5 games and allows NO GOALS in those FIVE GAMES and loses ONE does not deserve to be in the final...
OP
VERY WRONG KID.
Average coaches do not manage sides like this no matter how CLOSE they are to management....teams like Milan and Juve have LITTLE patience ... Milan have fired Capello (in his horrible 97 season) and even Sacchi..
Juve have indirectly fired Lippi and Trap.
Trust me...this is the "BIG LEAGUES" and mediocrity will not do...
Average coaches do not manage sides like this no matter how CLOSE they are to management....teams like Milan and Juve have LITTLE patience ... Milan have fired Capello (in his horrible 97 season) and even Sacchi..
Juve have indirectly fired Lippi and Trap.
Trust me...this is the "BIG LEAGUES" and mediocrity will not do...
Anti-football? To a degree it is seen as anti-football but thats wide scale across Europe. It's not reserved for Italians like you make out.
I've posted in response to this about 10 times with you, you skip it every time and continually post it. I guess you see it as a poke at English teams or something. Quite silly really.
I've posted in response to this about 10 times with you, you skip it every time and continually post it. I guess you see it as a poke at English teams or something. Quite silly really.
