++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
Well if Baros was indeed in an offsides position, and obstructed the view of Dida, that is considered interfering with play. If that was the case, the goal should have been called back.
++ [ originally posted by Seven
] ++
It's not about whether he did it intentionally or not. Did he block Dida's view? Yes. Was he in an offside position? Yes.
No goal, Jae

.
That's easy to say from a Milan sympathiser's point of view, and if you look at it that way, of course the goal should be disallowed... but on the flipside, imagine if you were a Liverpool fan, and the ref disallowed that goal simply because Baros was 'offside', despite his best efforts not to get in the way of the ball. It would've been a bloody outrage.
++ [ originally posted by IncuboRossonero ] ++
I cannot speak of SKY UK .. I can only comment on what I saw..and you know better than most than LIVE is the best way to spot on offside....
I disagree.. but that's probably because I've never been to a match in my life
Still, logic would tell me that a TV replay showing it 5 times from 17 different angles would give a better idea than a once-off view of an incident from the stands (especially when you're wearing Rossonero glasses, not to make any accusations against anyone in particular of course).
Isn't it very difficult to judge an offside call from the stands unless the play happened directly in front of where you're sitting? I'd imagine that parallax error would play a large part in what a stadium audience 'sees'