I have only read the last page but to think of civilians/innocents as "collateral damage" is something that is similar to, accepted or calculated risk, is ridiculous. "Terrorists" are not only born simply because one extremist cleric has one view of a religion or ideology and starts spreading it and people eat it up. It also comes from forms of oppression, injustice etc. That's why they always say one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter. One boy can grow up as a terrorist, fuelled with hate, anger, things like that and not understanding why he had lost his whole family as "collateral damage" when bombed by foreign nations. They're not going to think, oh, they are trying to stop the Taliban here, to them these foreign countries have killed and destroyed everything they've had anyway.