Your last sentence is something else though. I'm not saying they overpay them. I say they work two hours a day. And even if they do work more it's a bullshit job anyway. Not to say your job is useless, but the enormous rise of hr jobs is significant really. We're always creating jobs out of thin air instead of acknowledging that maybe working less is the way to go.
You're saying that most jobs are actually useless, but how do you define usefulness or uselessness? If they were useless in the sense that the cost of employing people does not create any sort of value, they would most certainly be eliminated. Organizations who employ people in jobs that are obsolete will eventually be driven out of the market by more efficient competitors.
I also don't understand the bolded part, is that some kind of utopia? I'd love to live in a world where working less is the way to go
- - - Updated - - -
Oh, well yes, under this onslaught of Keynesianism it's an unavoidable fact in the marketplace. Of course everyone expects inflation to persist in the future when costs continue to rise in spite of weak economic growth. That's why Keynesian policies don't work, they create self-perpetuating inflation from all angles of the economy. Recession possible? Print money. Worried about inflation? Increase the minimum wage. Have too much debt? Issue more to pay the interest. See how that works?
So yes, it is indeed unavoidable when tenured nitwit professors get together with wall street bankers to create economic policy.
Indeed, and you're right, businesses will cut jobs. Right now we have more people out of the labor force than in 50 years. It's pretty simple -- increase wages above the market clearing equilibrium, and naturally job losses will rise. So not only do you create self-perpetuating inflation, you also do it in an environment of lower demand.
How stupid is that?
I disagree, unless you're referring to companies who only participate in government contract work. Then I would agree. I know several folks who make 90K a year and only put in two hours of hard work each day just because they are paid by their fucking government contract. One is as dumb as a box of rocks! But outside of this worthless government industry, publicly traded firms are driven to cut costs anywhere and everywhere. I have several employees under my team and all actually do put in 8 hours of constant work every single day. If volumes decrease substantially on a consistent basis, then jobs will be eliminated. This happens daily around the globe in real industry.
- - - Updated - - -
Yup.
So yes, it is indeed unavoidable when tenured nitwit professors get together with wall street bankers to create economic policy.
Indeed, and you're right, businesses will cut jobs. Right now we have more people out of the labor force than in 50 years. It's pretty simple -- increase wages above the market clearing equilibrium, and naturally job losses will rise. So not only do you create self-perpetuating inflation, you also do it in an environment of lower demand.
How stupid is that?
I disagree, unless you're referring to companies who only participate in government contract work. Then I would agree. I know several folks who make 90K a year and only put in two hours of hard work each day just because they are paid by their fucking government contract. One is as dumb as a box of rocks! But outside of this worthless government industry, publicly traded firms are driven to cut costs anywhere and everywhere. I have several employees under my team and all actually do put in 8 hours of constant work every single day. If volumes decrease substantially on a consistent basis, then jobs will be eliminated. This happens daily around the globe in real industry.
- - - Updated - - -
Yup.

