News that makes you say WTF! (62 Viewers)

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
85,042
Mark Zuckerberg Says Social Media Is Over: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/mark-zuckerberg-says-social-media-is-over
https://archive.is/UnNjh

LMAO. So Meta basically turned Facebook from "connecting with friends" into "doom-scrolling random content" and now claims that's what users wanted? Let's not pretend this wasn't something driven by Facebook/Meta to satisfy Wall Street. Social media did not naturally evolve into what it is today: engagement bait, consumption of content creator and advertiser content, etc. This resulted from purposeful business strategic decisions to pivot from a place to learn who is fucking who to a place where advertisers and monetization rule.
Facebook never became what users wanted. It's what Zuck wanted. And that is power and money.

Which is why he cucked out overnight after visiting Mar-a-Lago.

This fuck was beginning to be somewhat almost likable last year when compared to Musk, but he can't help himself.
His $3 million makeover didn't fool me for a second.

Just like I never fell for Bill Gates and his Gates Foundation altruist charm offensive.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
75,606
https://pluralistic.net/2025/04/23/zuckerstreisand/#zdgaf

Former Facebook exec Sarah Wynn-Williams claims Fuckerberg's employees let him win Settlers of Catan in her new book "Careless People." He sounds like a fucking manbaby who can't lose (and who accuses Wynn-Williams of cheating when she fails to throw a game of Ticket to Ride while they're flying in his private jet).
I think at some point most people in his position become so wealthy and self-important that they lose all sense of reality and struggle to relate to anyone else.
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
34,900
I think at some point most people in his position become so wealthy and self-important that they lose all sense of reality and struggle to relate to anyone else.
personality rarely changes at that age when these people realistically become wealthy. self-importance is already noticeable in kindergartens. my son (10) has classmates who already lack empathy and have personality traits that i - a non-psychologist - would easily describe as narcissistic and remind me of adult sociopaths i crossed paths with.

tl;dr: i think that zuckerberg was probably already an entitled jerk as a teenager
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
75,606
personality rarely changes at that age when these people realistically become wealthy. self-importance is already noticeable in kindergartens. my son (10) has classmates who already lack empathy and have personality traits that i - a non-psychologist - would easily describe as narcissistic and remind me of adult sociopaths i crossed paths with.

tl;dr: i think that zuckerberg was probably already an entitled jerk as a teenager
Yeah I agree with that to an extent. People have different personalities. Autism is to blame for some of this as well, whether you believe that's a cause or a diagnosis. I feel like I'm there somewhere as well, but I don't completely lack empathy. I always think that if I was to become super wealthy (it's not going to happen and that's fine) I'd be concerned how it could potentially change me as a person. You have people kissing your ass all day long. You can circumvent many laws or social norms with your wealth, there is a degree of being untouchable. With the wrong person it can create a bit of a monster.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
85,042
I think at some point most people in his position become so wealthy and self-important that they lose all sense of reality and struggle to relate to anyone else.
A friend of my wife's best friend told me an odd story that happened about 8 years ago. He's your basic briefcase businessman who lives in rural Ireland and pretty much gets along with everybody.

He had a chance meeting with Zuck at a private event in Ireland. Facebook had their global HQ in Ireland back then, and Zuck would come out once every several months. The guy had no clue who Zuck was -- he thought he was just some bloke. Which didn't exactly rise a "Don't you know who I am??" from Zuck as much as a, "Hmmm, he seems safe and doesn't know who I am". He showed Zuck to a nearby local pub of his and they chatted a bit more.

So Zuck asked if he could call him the next time he flies into town to find out about similar small social gatherings. He said sure, so they exchanged phone numbers. But on Zuck's condition of, "But just so we're clear -- this does not mean we are friends." So the guy is like, ok weird, but whatever.

Zuck would call him on future visits. But he took a massive risk in sharing his phone number with some rando in Ireland. To me it kind of suggests how Zuck has a moat built around him in life and in his head, but it gets lonely in there.
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
34,900
Imagine how many of these type of rare weather events have been attributed as miracles, divine intervention, magic, UFOs etc over the past few thousand years.
back in the 80s i read plenty of books about stuff like poltergeist, telekinesis, telepathy, ufos, ball lightnings, stigmata, ghosts, stuff like that. turns out ball lightnings are real and the rest is likely bullshit lol
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
75,606
back in the 80s i read plenty of books about stuff like poltergeist, telekinesis, telepathy, ufos, ball lightnings, stigmata, ghosts, stuff like that. turns out ball lightnings are real and the rest is likely bullshit lol
It's an interesting if very broad array of topics. Personally, I'd say the majority of these things are either natural or cerebral phenomena, or made by con artists. These days it's even more popular to believe in the unlikely, you can go down rabbit holes for days on end on YouTube, social media, podcasts, etc that are set up to generate views, interest and money.
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,670
It's an interesting if very broad array of topics. Personally, I'd say the majority of these things are either natural or cerebral phenomena, or made by con artists. These days it's even more popular to believe in the unlikely, you can go down rabbit holes for days on end on YouTube, social media, podcasts, etc that are set up to generate views, interest and money.
I follow this really good channel on YouTube with a guy who does investigative journalism and ended up on his “Bigfoot in PA” video. It sounds stupid but it’s probably one of the most entertaining videos I’ve ever watched

 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
75,606
Quite honestly the worst shootout I've ever seen, and whoever it was that recently said that Lauren James is the best footballer in the world both men's and women's need their head's checked.

I'm all for gender equality when justified, but equal pay? fucking hell seen U10s play better football.
I only intermittently watch women's football, like bits of matches maybe 2 years apart. Compared to 10 or even 5 years ago you can see a big improvement in the level, but some things remain a bit amateurish.

It shouldn't really be compared to men's football at all.
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
34,900
i was on the phone with my brother last night, he watched italy and whoever they were playing against. he said that it wasn't terrible but very far from even low level men's football

someone mocked lehmann the other day when the swiss women's team apparently lost to some u15 boys' team by a big margin. that's probably representative to their level. equal pay my ass. i get that serena williams was very popular, so was sharapova, steffi graf and some female tennis players here and there, but that's the exception. usually women's sports are simply not that entertaining to watch, hence the lower commercial revenue, and the consequent lower prize money. it makes complete sense. if you're that popular then milk the sponsors ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,480
I only intermittently watch women's football, like bits of matches maybe 2 years apart. Compared to 10 or even 5 years ago you can see a big improvement in the level, but some things remain a bit amateurish.

It shouldn't really be compared to men's football at all.

There have been massive improvements though and I think at this point people should stop mocking the sport.

As little as 5 years ago I think we were right to laugh. They were not just bad, they were pretty much untrained. When you compared them to female athletes in track and field, but also in team sports like field hockey, it was obvious they were nowhere near that level. Today however they are getting there. Does it excite me as much as the men's game? No, not at all. Unfortunately women's sports never excite me as much, because they're weaker and slower. But as long as they put the effort in, they deserve basic respect.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 56)