'Murica! (265 Viewers)

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,984

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,785
So is that it? If the US Supreme Court agrees, he can't be re-elected?

If this was the case and I was Trump, I would invite all those morons who stormed the capitol to Mar-a-Lago, get 'em in a big convention center, and gas all their dumb asses dead.
I guess it would have to by its implication alone, surely they can't say Colorado is right and then he be allowed to continue running? I can't picture this holding up though, what even happens at that point?
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,984
I guess it would have to by its implication alone, surely they can't say Colorado is right and then he be allowed to continue running? I can't picture this holding up though, what even happens at that point?
Not sure. I mean, if the thought is that Trump is guilty of leading an insurrection, then the laws of the constitution should hold up between supreme courts. The question would be whether the court thinks he's guilty of the insurrection or not.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,661
So is that it? If the US Supreme Court agrees, he can't be re-elected?

If this was the case and I was Trump, I would invite all those morons who stormed the capitol to Mar-a-Lago, get 'em in a big convention center, and gas all their dumb asses dead.
ballots are a state thing. If the Supreme Court agree then Colorado can remove him from the ballot. And so can other states
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,326
So is that it? If the US Supreme Court agrees, he can't be re-elected?

If this was the case and I was Trump, I would invite all those morons who stormed the capitol to Mar-a-Lago, get 'em in a big convention center, and gas all their dumb asses dead.
If I was Trump I'd try to make sure the US Supreme Court doesn't have to decide the matter.

It would be such a gamble.

I get that it's a conservative court and that he appointed several justices. But they are still US Supreme Court justices and they won't decide in his favour just because he's Trump.

And if they rule against him, it's just inviting all other states to ban his nomination as well.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
 

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,814
She lacks the fundamental god given assigned gender and biological components required to even contend with DJT

So far the pre election szn hype for contenders is a South Indian billionaire and a woman :lol:

Talk about shooting fish in a barrel for DJT
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,934
@Bjerknes @campionesidd @.zero @Hust @GordoDeCentral @AFL_ITALIA @KB824 and other ‘muricans

What do y’all think of Nikki Haley? I don’t know much about her, but she looks like the only one with a shot of beating Trump in the GOP primaries…
She's only relevant now because this happened:





Like Dru said she has not even a slight chance of beating Trump in the primary. 0%

Even if Trump is somehow unable to run he probably endorses/ MAGA votes for Vivek because Vivek will then pardon him
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,789

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,785
@Bjerknes @campionesidd @.zero @Hust @GordoDeCentral @AFL_ITALIA @KB824 and other ‘muricans

What do y’all think of Nikki Haley? I don’t know much about her, but she looks like the only one with a shot of beating Trump in the GOP primaries…
Prior to Trump winning, I thought she'd eventually end up as President one day. After him, I don't know anymore considering how outwardly retarded to Republican party has become.

For the most part I don't like her though, personally.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 13, Guests: 230)