That's a false analogy. NBC doesn't provide everyone with a platform. Twitter does.
Andy makes a good point. This is no different from refusing to serve black people. Just because you're a private business, that doesn't mean you can do whatever you want.
In this case though they have their reasons and I'm very confident any court would decide that a private business is entitled to exclude users from their platform if it believes the platform is used to incite violence.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
Andy makes a good point. This is no different from refusing to serve black people. Just because you're a private business, that doesn't mean you can do whatever you want.
In this case though they have their reasons and I'm very confident any court would decide that a private business is entitled to exclude users from their platform if it believes the platform is used to incite violence.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn ONEPLUS A6003 met Tapatalk
This is different from refusing to serve black people. Because that much is on the basis of who they are. Which is unlike the basis on what someone does, which is why someone who comes into a store without pants or decides to defecate on the tables can be banned from a private business. There is a right to refuse service on the basis of things other than the race you were born with.
People don't have the choice to be born black or not. But people do have a choice on whether to egg on people to violently overthrow a government building or not.
