'Murica! (40 Viewers)
- Thread starter Fake Melo
- Start date
- Tags afl_italia's cousins forza trump smocking gun
@ALC
Conservatives: Poor people should pull themselves up by their boot straps. Work hard!
AOC: Grows up lower middle class, puts in the hard work to get to college, double majors, father dies in her second year, still graduates cum laude, works as a waitress and bartender after college to help her mother (a cleaning lady) avoid foreclosure on her home. Runs a grassroots campaign and is elected youngest women to US congress in history.
Conservatives: Communism!
Conservatives: Poor people should pull themselves up by their boot straps. Work hard!
AOC: Grows up lower middle class, puts in the hard work to get to college, double majors, father dies in her second year, still graduates cum laude, works as a waitress and bartender after college to help her mother (a cleaning lady) avoid foreclosure on her home. Runs a grassroots campaign and is elected youngest women to US congress in history.
Conservatives: Communism!
@ALC
Conservatives: Poor people should pull themselves up by their boot straps. Work hard!
AOC: Grows up lower middle class, puts in the hard work to get to college, double majors, father dies in her second year, still graduates cum laude, works as a waitress and bartender after college to help her mother (a cleaning lady) avoid foreclosure on her home. Runs a grassroots campaign and is elected youngest women to US congress in history.
Conservatives: Communism!
Conservatives: Poor people should pull themselves up by their boot straps. Work hard!
AOC: Grows up lower middle class, puts in the hard work to get to college, double majors, father dies in her second year, still graduates cum laude, works as a waitress and bartender after college to help her mother (a cleaning lady) avoid foreclosure on her home. Runs a grassroots campaign and is elected youngest women to US congress in history.
Conservatives: Communism!
Dear leader doesn't give an F about them lmao. Literally his pawns
"Trump was more upset that Capitol mob looked ‘low class’ than about violent attacks, reports say"
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ob-capitol-riots-poor-low-class-b1785099.html
"Trump was more upset that Capitol mob looked ‘low class’ than about violent attacks, reports say"
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ob-capitol-riots-poor-low-class-b1785099.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/09/us/politics/flag-lowering-trump-sicknick.html
lol. Trump and his cult don’t give a fuck about blue lives
lol. Trump and his cult don’t give a fuck about blue lives
I don’t think this has changed BLM types opinion on the police at all... they’re arguing that this attempted coup d’état just shows how complicit most police are with White supremacist Trumptards. Which in some cases is obviously true, though obviously not for the vast majority of cops who are good professionals doing their job.
https://www.businessinsider.in/poli...licans-and-democrats/articleshow/80204385.cms
A wee bit late after pressure from GOP and Dem lawmakers... but better late than never I suppose.
- - - Updated - - -
What about the change in narrative from major media outlets like Fox News?
New York Times is in no way comparable to the rubbish CNN puts out. And Fox News. It still has bias, but it’s far more balanced and reasonable, and less sensationalist than the others. It was also nowhere close to CNN stance wise on defund the police. Might as well have been reading huffington post this summer at CNN.
A wee bit late after pressure from GOP and Dem lawmakers... but better late than never I suppose.
- - - Updated - - -
What about the change in narrative from major media outlets like Fox News?
New York Times is in no way comparable to the rubbish CNN puts out. And Fox News. It still has bias, but it’s far more balanced and reasonable, and less sensationalist than the others. It was also nowhere close to CNN stance wise on defund the police. Might as well have been reading huffington post this summer at CNN.
80 million people don't have their rights thrown out the window over a Walgreen's parking lot?
Absolutely true. A Duck Dynasty cosplay party was always going to be the only folk who passed that filter test.
Or green lives or navy lives.
Well, at least Pope Francis got arrested for child sex trafficking and -- get this, because QAnon feels the need to amp it up -- incest. 
Time to put Wagner’s Der Ring Des Nibelungen on the turntable, drink some more wine, and drown out this absurdity.
No, you're too quick in your reasoning.
What I meant was that in both instances a private business offers something (be it a social media platform, be it food).
In both instances that private business decides to not offer their service to a certain potential client.
The question (which you answered above) then becomes on what grounds they can decide to do so. As you rightfully say, they cannot decide to do this based on the colour of someone's skin. A restaurant choosing not to serve someone, will have to demonstrate good reason for doing so or they'll open themselves up to law suits.
The exact same thing goes for Twitter. Imagine if they randomly blocked Biden earlier this year. They'd effectively take away part of his campagain. If Biden would have gone to court and Twitter could not show a good reason to support their decision, I'm fairly confident the court would have told them to allow Biden to post.
This whole notion that private businesses have limitless freedom is flat out wrong. If you decide to offer people a social media platform, you will have to play by certain rules.
So no, Twitter can't just ban Trump, because they're a private business anyway.
What I meant was that in both instances a private business offers something (be it a social media platform, be it food).
In both instances that private business decides to not offer their service to a certain potential client.
The question (which you answered above) then becomes on what grounds they can decide to do so. As you rightfully say, they cannot decide to do this based on the colour of someone's skin. A restaurant choosing not to serve someone, will have to demonstrate good reason for doing so or they'll open themselves up to law suits.
The exact same thing goes for Twitter. Imagine if they randomly blocked Biden earlier this year. They'd effectively take away part of his campagain. If Biden would have gone to court and Twitter could not show a good reason to support their decision, I'm fairly confident the court would have told them to allow Biden to post.
This whole notion that private businesses have limitless freedom is flat out wrong. If you decide to offer people a social media platform, you will have to play by certain rules.
So no, Twitter can't just ban Trump, because they're a private business anyway.