'Murica! (155 Viewers)

GordoDeCentral

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
#10,021
Apr 14, 2005
70,837
#10,021
king Ale said:
The said policy evaluates people's credentials, and one's qualification should and does have nothing to do with where they are from. The "on average" argument that you use to show what Trump said was not racist is the definition of stereotyping, which is fine, understandable and useful as long as there is absolutely no other/better way of making a judgment. Why would you need to predict on average how much contribution a Haitian versus a Norwegian can make to the society when you can easily look at their qualifications before letting them in? When you have a much better and more accurate way of making such judgment (which is the whole rationale behind the merit-based policy), yet you choose to group Haitians and Africans in a bucket of useless parasites who need to be taken out it only means one thing, and no matter how prettier you try to label it it simply doesn't work.
Click to expand...
You are mixing the 2 comments, i provided a link that explained the context of each comment. The Hatians were mentioned in relation to the temporary protected status and Haiti was neither called a shithole or compared to Norway FYI as the name of the program suggests the stay of those Haitians in the country is temporary as it was only prompted by the earthquake of 2010. So their status is up for debate. The second comment is in relative to the lottery program and you are actually in agreement with Trump and the GOP based on what you wrote above.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
king Ale

king Ale

Senior Member
#10,022
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
#10,022
Sigh.

My post explains why merit based immigration policy is not a discriminatory one based on country of birth, hence the “he said what he said within that context so it’s not racist” is bs because in fact within that context what he said was not only racist but the opposite of what the merit based policy implies as well. The fact that you infer from my post that i agree with that policy btw strengthens my opinion about how inaccurate you are in linking things and reaching conclusions.
 
GordoDeCentral

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
#10,023
Apr 14, 2005
70,837
#10,023
No it is not, if we are to go by a lottery program then the US is obviously better served doing so in Norway than in africa, this is the explanation of the quote. What Trump and the GOP want is the scraping altogether of the lottery be it for Norway or elsewhere.

Also instead of showing frustration towards my posting, maybe you can spend the energy to actually research for yourself what was said and in what contexts instead of just being taken for a ride by out of context quotes.
 
king Ale

king Ale

Senior Member
#10,024
Oct 28, 2004
21,689
#10,024
GordoDeCentral said:
No it is not, if we are to go by a lottery program then the US is obviously better served doing so in Norway than in africa, this is the explanation of the quote. What Trump and the GOP want is the scraping altogether of the lottery be it for Norway or elsewhere.

Also instead of showing frustration towards my posting, maybe you can spend the energy to actually research for yourself what was said and in what contexts instead of just being taken for a ride by out of context quotes.
Click to expand...
1. One should compare Norway and African “shitholes” when/if suggesting that the lottery program should choose applicants from Norway rather than Africa because of the “on average” argument. In that, one is making a racist comment because there are non-discriminatory ways of assessing a person’s qualifications (if one is not interested in the person’s skin color that is). 2. One should not mention any nationality when the discussion is about removing the lottery program altogether, cause nationality is irrelevant to the merit based policy. Either way, bringing nationalities to this discussion (regardless of what the desired outcome is) is racist.

You have the habit of linking irrelevant things and drawing strange and inaccurate conclusions. This is lazy at best and dishonest at worst. Then when it’s mentioned you are congratulating yourself for being frustrating? My impression is that in most of the discussions you have here or elsewhere that’s the goal you want to achieve or think you have achieved while in fact it makes you very much unworthy of the time others spend in having a conversation with you.
 
GordoDeCentral

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
#10,025
Apr 14, 2005
70,837
#10,025
king Ale said:
1. One should compare Norway and African “shitholes” when/if suggesting that the lottery program should choose applicants from Norway rather than Africa because of the “on average” argument. In that, one is making a racist comment because there are non-discriminatory ways of assessing a person’s qualifications (if one is not interested in the person’s skin color that is). 2. One should not mention any nationality when the discussion is about removing the lottery program altogether, cause nationality is irrelevant to the merit based policy. Either way, bringing nationalities to this discussion (regardless of what the desired outcome is) is racist.

You have the habit of linking irrelevant things and drawing strange and inaccurate conclusions. This is lazy at best and dishonest at worst. Then when it’s mentioned you are congratulating yourself for being frustrating? My impression is that in most of the discussions you have here or elsewhere that’s the goal you want to achieve or think you have achieved while in fact it makes you very much unworthy of the time others spend in having a conversation with you.
Click to expand...
:lol: what a bunch of bullshit, yes randomly picking people from first world educated countries is the same as doing so in in the shitholes of the world.
Your ad hominem only confirms you actually know nothing about the subject and just want to throw a hissy fit. And I'll gladly take you up on that offer of you not wasting your time replying to me, it will save me time constantly correcting you ;)
 
DAiDEViL

DAiDEViL

Senior Member
#10,031
Feb 21, 2015
64,704
#10,031
:lol:

[video=twitter;953794085751574534]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/953794085751574534[/video]

https://gop.com/the-highly-anticipated-2017-fake-news-awards/

While the media spent 90% of the time focused on negative coverage or fake news, the President has been getting results:



1. The economy has created nearly 2 million jobs and gained over $8 trillion in wealth since the President’s inauguration.

2. African Americans and Hispanics are enjoying the lowest unemployment rate in recorded history.

3. The President signed historic tax cuts and relief for hardworking Americans not seen since President Reagan.

4. President Trump’s plan to cut regulations has exceeded “2 out for every 1 in” mandate, issuing 22 deregulatory actions for every one new regulatory action.

5. The President has unleashed an American energy boom by ending Obama-era regulations, approving the Keystone pipeline, auctioning off millions of new acres for energy exploration, and opening up ANWR.

6. ISIS is in retreat, having been crushed in Iraq and Syria.

7. President Trump followed through on his promise to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of the State of Israel and instructed the State Department to begin to relocate the Embassy.

8. With President Trump’s encouragement, more member nations are paying their fair share for the common defense in the NATO alliance.

9. Signed the Veterans Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act to allow senior officials in the VA to fire failing employees and establishes safeguards to protect whistleblowers.

10. President Trump kept his promise and appointed Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Click to expand...
@Seven
 
Ronn

Ronn

Senior Member
#10,033
May 3, 2012
20,899
#10,033
This guy is 24 years old, graduated from college in 2016 and has been appointed the Deputy Drug Czar (deputy chief of staff of the Office of National Drug Control Policy)

I guess Trump is really serious about opioid crisis
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 5, Guests: 124)

  • ... and 3 more.