'Murica! (210 Viewers)

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,664
And then he'll claim Mexico indirectly paid for it through tariffs and trade deals.

And gullible intellectually lazy people like Andy and Zach will believe him.
He will probably try to tax remittances. Which only a scumbag would do. Because US citizens can pay a remittance. So anyway Mexico won't pay.

- - - Updated - - -

A better question would be, where ?

The entire border with Mexico is walled off with a gigantic fence
It isn't. Why say such definitive things if you aren't sure they are 100% correct?

- - - Updated - - -

And what makes him think the wall will prevent them from entering US? Has he ever heard about tunnels?

This doesn't make sense.
It is a waste of money. Dumb idea. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a moron.
 

icemaη

Rab's Husband - The Regista
Moderator
Aug 27, 2008
36,368
He will probably try to tax remittances. Which only a scumbag would do. Because US citizens can pay a remittance. So anyway Mexico won't pay.

- - - Updated - - -



It isn't. Why say such definitive things if you aren't sure they are 100% correct?

- - - Updated - - -



It is a waste of money. Dumb idea. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a moron.
Didn't you guys already spend millions to make those flimsy fences that fell down during the Bush era? All them government contractors must be drooling atm.
 

Maddy

Oracle of Copenhagen
Jul 10, 2009
16,545

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
It isn't. Why say such definitive things if you aren't sure they are 100% correct?
I'll give you an insane hint : There was a questionmark.


I know they fenced off nearly everywhere, and the critical points got those huge high fences.

- - - Updated - - -

Anyone with the slightest hint of academic background and insight into the processes of democracy should be really worried about stories like these:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-trump-epa-studies-20170125-story.html

It's quite remarkable that someone with a degree in natural science (or claims to have one) supports someone like Trump. Where's ones academic integrity?
Nice article

details of scientific evidence showing that the Earth's climate is warming and man-made carbon emissions are to blame
the quote is a direct lie.


But the point you are making, that they want to review it before it cna be released, is indeed bad. Sounds a much bit like Russia.

- - - Updated - - -

self-knowledge much?

On a more serious note: how can you keep on discussing with such a volatile character as Zach?
quoting my points and give your argument so i can return the favor ?
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Anyone with the slightest hint of academic background and insight into the processes of democracy should be really worried about stories like these:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-trump-epa-studies-20170125-story.html

It's quite remarkable that someone with a degree in natural science (or claims to have one) supports someone like Trump. Where's ones academic integrity?
Only an idiot can support Trump. I keep trying avoid this statement and casting judgment on so many people, but every time he opens his mouth I'm inevitably led to that conclusion.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...rump-voter-fraud-analysis-20170124-story.html

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...voter-fraud-investigation-20170125-story.html

How could anyone support this bullshit. Yeah. Republicans only work with "actual truth"... He's claiming that 3-5 million illegal votes were cast exclusively for Hillary because he's such a petulant child that he absolutely cannot handle the idea he lost the popular vote... and there is talk of a DoJ investigation into this made-up voter fraud, so now you get a colossal waste of taxpayer dollars, and a stoking of the fires for voter suppression laws being put in place in republican states, which is already an issue.

Shameful.

And ::lol3:: that his own daughter was registered in 2 states.

- - - Updated - - -

Trump is basically claiming that Hillary and the DNC organized a massive and unprecendented campaign of voter fraud against him with 3-5 million illegal votes, which is like 3% of the total cast, and somehow they completely forgot about the importance of swing states and lost the election anyways :lol:
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
So, its okay if the green party candidate orders a recount on various states, but not if trump does it ?
Each recount performed ended up in Trumps favor btw. So she quickly stopped it.



Trump is obviously not doing this because he is <insert typical generic insult>, he's doing this because he's a populist that is working on his re-election allready.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
So, its okay if the green party candidate orders a recount on various states, but not if trump does it ?
Each recount performed ended up in Trumps favor btw. So she quickly stopped it.



Trump is obviously not doing this because he is <insert typical generic insult>, he's doing this because he's a populist that is working on his re-election allready.

I don't think you're getting it. Trump is president. He has actual real world problems to worry about. He shouldn't be doing any of this.

And the entire reason election fraud was ever a thing is because of Trump. He's the one who raised it. Probably because he expected to lose.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
I don't think you're getting it. Trump is president. He has actual real world problems to worry about. He shouldn't be doing any of this.

And the entire reason election fraud was ever a thing is because of Trump. He's the one who raised it. Probably because he expected to lose.
Remember in Belgium when we had actual big issues to be concerned with, but all they did was the B-H-V debate ?
Yeah, he shouldnt. But sending 3 tweets and ordering an investigation isnt occupying his time too much.
He's just beeing a populist for re-election purposes.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 10, Guests: 182)