You believe this study (of which you provided no link) proves that when a woman is raped and the sperm of the man raping her ends up inside of her, it is less likely that she will become pregnant if the same thing happens with consensual sex?
- - - Updated - - -
It was a lot easier to immigrate to the US. Both legally and illegally. But the conditions are so different you can't really conclude anything from that. I'm honestly not quite sure what point he thinks he is making.
I provided a link to that study. Which showed a 5% pregnancy rate among rape victims (it also ignored things like condom use). Other studies have shown upwards of 10% and even as high as 17%. I linked one of these.
AC said scientific research shows pregnancies resulting from rape are very rare to the point of being irrelevant, which is simply a conservative talking point and not true at all. There’s not a single peer-reviewed study that shows this.
It’s more likely based on widespread medieval scientific notions that a woman could not get pregnant without experiencing pleasure/orgasm, which was used to convict pregnant women who were raped of adultery.
And now be’s trying to change the goalposts to say that 5% is lower than actual pregnancy rates so he was right. But that’s not how it works. He said rape-related pregnancies are so rare that they are irrelevant to the abortion discussion. 5% of rape victims becoming pregnant is not rare, nor are 30,000 plus pregnancies a year from rape irrelevant.
But he continues to make spurious and ignorant claims on things he has no clue about and can’t back any of them up with actual evidence. It’s the same every time.
- - - Updated - - -
He wasn't being critical he was mocking and had his laughing face etc
I was criticizing the hypocrisy of your point of view on abortion, which is so outrageous it inspires laughter.