Wait, you use a paragraph from the same article to call it "fake news"? I thought you had no idea what "fake news" means but I doubt you even know what fake means. Hillary selling Uranium to Russia is real news though
What do you think Trump people and Russian intelligence were discussing after all? Putin's pubic hair? Were you desperately searching up and down the web for evidence if it was anybody other than Cheetofuhrer?
His involvement in US elections could turn out to be the dog-faced kremlin mongolian's biggest miscalculation as he was expecting free reign in eastern europe + sanction lifting from Trump.
The thing is, can it even be considered a u-turn? I'm asking based on the simple fact that he doesn't seem have the slightest goddamn idea of what he's talking about. Ever. He has no idea of the nuances or depth of the situation, it's obvious.