'Murica! (177 Viewers)

[Ronn]

I take it with a grain of salt but if true it's really funny in a terrifying way
http://www.news.com.au/travel/trave...s/news-story/8222c65d2f12e6691ef27c9b1753e821

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[ZoSo]

Except Hillary never did sell uranium to the ruskis, a morons parrot shares his master's intellectual laziness

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Sure is a nice coincidence then

 

[GordoDeCentral]

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Sure is a nice coincidence then

Wait i thought the times was fake news? I'm really confused, anyways lemme explain to you in less than 2 sentences coz i know you didn't read that article, the Russian mining company has only production rights and cannot sell uranium outside the US. Clinton didn't even have the authority to block such a deal, only the president can.

 

[Post Ironic]

Trump and the republicans whining and crying about Intelligence leaks now that hurt their credibility, but were positively glee-faced over the last year about leaks that damaged Clinton's campaign.

Trump literally asked Russia to hack Hillary's email and release whatever they found.

So... it's okay to request a foreign power to hack a presidential candidates email, to applaud Russia and Wikileaks for hacking and releasing emails and sensitive information of the DNC, etc, to applaud intelligence links leaked that were damaging to the Clinton. Back then "the source of the leak" was irrelevant, only the content mattered.

Now that these links cast dark shadows on this administration "the low-life leakers will be caught."

 

[swag]

In psychology they call it projection.

Just like how the most rabid anti-gay politicians are typically the ones playing footsie in the men's room with the neighboring bathroom stall.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Trump and the republicans whining and crying about Intelligence leaks now that hurt their credibility, but were positively glee-faced over the last year about leaks that damaged Clinton's campaign.

Trump literally asked Russia to hack Hillary's email and release whatever they found.

So... it's okay to request a foreign power to hack a presidential candidates email, to applaud Russia and Wikileaks for hacking and releasing emails and sensitive information of the DNC, etc, to applaud intelligence links leaked that were damaging to the Clinton. Back then "the source of the leak" was irrelevant, only the content mattered.

Now that these links cast dark shadows on this administration "the low-life leakers will be caught."

True... but is it just me, or are the major networks like CNN and co. now very happy to report on info obtained from leaks, when they weren't so much during the election campaign?

 

[Seven]

Trump literally asked Russia to hack Hillary's email and release whatever they found.

Well, let's not go this far. Because if there is proof of this happening, that would be considered treason.

 

[Maddy]

True... but is it just me, or are the major networks like CNN and co. now very happy to report on info obtained from leaks, when they weren't so much during the election campaign?

??

Wat..

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

??

Wat..

Maybe I'm wrong. But I seem to remember CNN and BBC for example mostly overlooking or just barely reporting about info from Wikileaks unless it was to accuse the Russians of interference.

 

[Seven]

??

Wat..

I think he means to say that during the election major news networks pointed out that the information, which appeared to be leaked at crucial times, was leaked in order to influence the election. Some might say that they seemed less interested in the actual information at hand.

I'm just saying what I think he means btw, I think the whole e-mail thing was a disgrace and Comey's 'revelation' was just as hurtful towards the democratic process as Trump himself.

- - - Updated - - -

Maybe I'm wrong. But I seem to remember CNN and BBC for example mostly overlooking or just barely reporting about info from Wikileaks unless it was to accuse the Russians of interference.

Oh. You meant something else .

I disagree with you there.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

I think he means to say that during the election major news networks pointed out that the information, which appeared to be leaked at crucial times, was leaked in order to influence the election. Some might say that they seemed less interested in the actual information at hand.

I'm just saying what I think he means btw, I think the whole e-mail thing was a disgrace and Comey's 'revelation' was just as hurtful towards the democratic process as Trump himself.

Well, that too. But obviously the revelations of these latest leaks are much more serious.

 

[Maddy]

Maybe I'm wrong. But I seem to remember CNN and BBC for example mostly overlooking or just barely reporting about info from Wikileaks unless it was to accuse the Russians of interference.

Okay. But do you see the major flaw in your hypothesis?

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Okay. But do you see the major flaw in your hypothesis?

What is it? Btw I'm not really up to date on this Flynn story. Too many things happening too quickly, so hard to keep up!

 

[Maddy]

What is it? Btw I'm not really up to date on this Flynn story. Too many things happening too quickly, so hard to keep up!

Your assumption is pretty much based on "how you feel".

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Your assumption is pretty much based on "how you feel".

Yeah I know, that's what I said

 

[Post Ironic]

Well, let's not go this far. Because if there is proof of this happening, that would be considered treason.

You don't recall when he asked Russia to find Hillary's "missing emails"?

 

[Seven]

You don't recall when he asked Russia to find Hillary's "missing emails"?

I do, but that was hardly a serious request.

 

[Maddy]

Yeah I know, that's what I said

Welp. I feel like chicken tonight. Doesn't really make me a Poultry Farmer.

- - - Updated - - -

I do, but that was hardly a serious request.

Nope. But don't you think Flynn, Bannon etc., have been in contact with Russian officals about this matter?

 

[Post Ironic]

I do, but that was hardly a serious request.

He repeated it again on Twitter just a day or two after....

People said the same things about Trump's campaign promises... "Just rhetoric." They weren't.

 

[Seven]

Nope. But don't you think Flynn, Bannon etc., have been in contact with Russian officals about this matter?

I do. And if someone can prove that, I think one might make the case for it being treason.

He repeated it again on Twitter just a day or two after....

People said the same things about Trump's campaign promises... "Just rhetoric." They weren't.

I'm not saying Trump wasn't in serious talks with Russia regarding this. In fact I believe he was. But I don't think that what he said during this speech is enough.