'Murica! (215 Viewers)

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,489
[MENTION]X[/MENTION] The Republican establishment bombed two countries that had nothing to do with 9/11 and killed millions of people. What could Trump possibly do that is worse than that? What proof does anybody have? I'm not even a fan of him, but clearly he's a better option than that.
This is really one of the most naive posts I ever read.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,325
This is really one of the most naive posts I ever read.
Well, upto an extent he's right. It's just that he does set the bar quite low. I mean, apparently you're a decent candidate for president if you're not likely to kill millions of innocent people.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,489
The vast majority of the supposed terrorists were Saudi and the missing pages of the 9/11 report point to Saudi funding, not Afghani.

Why the revisionism? Most of the world supported and backed the Taliban invasion because they housed Bin Laden and operated as AL qaida. We're told to throw them out but that would never happen. The justification for this war was alot more sensible then the bogus Iraq one.


The fact they botched up the war effort and shit got worse doesn't change the valid reason to go there. Litterally harboring the culprits is pretty straight forward challenge.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,325
Why the revisionism? Most of the world supported and backed the Taliban invasion because they housed Bin Laden and operated as AL qaida. We're told to throw them out but that would never happen. The justification for this war was alot more sensible then the bogus Iraq one.


The fact they botched up the war effort and shit got worse doesn't change the valid reason to go there. Litterally harboring the culprits is pretty straight forward challenge.

I think that, maybe, you could even make a case legally for the Afghanistan invasion. Everything that was used as a reason to invade Iraq turned out to be a complete fabrication (which was also known at the time) and I'd say quite a few number of legal rules were violated there.
 

Juventino[RUS]

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2006
29,039
OOPS
Donald Trump's path to Republican nomination clear as Ted Cruz quits
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/03/ted-cruz-suspend-campaign-president-indiana-primary
Ohio Gov. John Kasich plans to suspend his run to be the GOP presidential nominee, multiple sources told NBC News on Wednesday.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/05/04/john-kasich-campaign-latest-news.html
Juventino[RUS];5052970 said:
Echelon poll says Trump has 3x the support of rivals.
Trump: 29%
Carson: 10%
Fiorina/Rubio: 9%

:lol: HE is so winning
what is he winning?
Juventino[RUS];5052977 said:
He'll be the republican candidate to presidency
When the other candidates start to pull out, it'll start to look bad for Trump. He has the advantage right now because he's the odd one out.
it's like this, you show up to work on monday morning, one of your coworkers gets up on his desk in frustration starts airing his widely shared grievances, people cheer him on, at the end of his rambunctious speech he invites everyone to walk out, how many follow?

- - - Updated - - -

you know more than the resident expert in everything??
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,750
I think that, maybe, you could even make a case legally for the Afghanistan invasion. Everything that was used as a reason to invade Iraq turned out to be a complete fabrication (which was also known at the time) and I'd say quite a few number of legal rules were violated there.
I can actually understand the Afghan invasion. Stupid risky, but at least then we had intelligence that people were being housed and trained behind direct attacks on the U.S. that killed thousands.

Iraq was a bunch of hawks duping everybody to extend the Patriot Act doctrine to stupidity.

I still can't get my head around how so many people want trump and believe all of his lies.
It's about wanting to cut off your nose to spite your face....

0b15a8923f57cfccec49232c25000f04.jpg


"Sticking it to the man" isn't a unique human desire. It's why they're burning down schools in South Africa right now. It's why they burned Detroit to the ground in the 60s.

Sheeeet. Screw the mic drop. Bettah was Prince and the mic slam back in 1981 at the end of this brilliant performance:

 

Ocelot

Midnight Marauder
Jul 13, 2013
18,943
[MENTION]X[/MENTION] The Republican establishment bombed two countries that had nothing to do with 9/11 and killed millions of people. What could Trump possibly do that is worse than that? What proof does anybody have? I'm not even a fan of him, but clearly he's a better option than that.
Really?

Being insane is also anti Establishment but it is not something to aspire to, as bad as establishment is chaos is much MUCH worse
Exactly.

This. People are so estranged from and alienated by the establishment to the point that a complete moron like Donald Trump is an appealing option to a large percentage of the voting public.

Rather than vote for an insane person or for the sociopathic Clinton, abstain from voting at all and help illustrate just how broken this 2-party system is.
Not voting is stupid. You won't ever break the system this way, and it just leads to (often moronic) fanatic minorities (in the political sense of course) getting more power relatively speaking. A vote for some random third party guy would be better for example.

- - - Updated - - -

You calling me a bitch?!?!?!?!

But yeah, how wrong I was. Professor RUS :delpiero:

...Ocelot should have been quoted too though. :(
You're wrong.

- - - Updated - - -

Also, how the fuck is Kasich the last guy standing against Trump when he has less delegates than fucking Rubio? :rofl:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 2, Guests: 189)