Movie Talk (New Films, Old Films... doesn't matter) (41 Viewers)

[Fint]

300 is a great movie, who cares about historical inaccuracies. Its visually stunning and the fight scenes are some of the greatest in recent history imo.

Made me wanna get in shape and buy a red cape more then Superman

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Nzoric]

Sucker Punch is 10 times the movie, with better visuals. Fucking noobs.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Sucker Punch

 

[Nzoric]

Sheik entered the discussion, I'm outta here.

 

[Monco]

Seriously, Sucker Punch? I had to force myself to watch 30 seconds of the trailer, it was so pathetic and stupid.

 

[piotrr]

Sucker Punch the only good thing about this movie is that it has an ending.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

TBH, I think it had some pretty good music too.

 

[Nzoric]

Seriously, Sucker Punch? I had to force myself to watch 30 seconds of the trailer, it was so pathetic and stupid.

You base your opinion on a 30 second trailer? I guess that goes pretty hand in hand with the current thread of basing opinions on info graphics.

 

[Nenz]

Tarantino doesn't give a $#@! about historic accuracy... there is no message in his movies, it's all about entertainment, always. Django is very entertaining.

That's a very shallow way to entertain. You may as well watch Transformers. Not even the dialogue in between all the action was interesting. Its not even about being completely historically accurate. Just don't be so blatantly inaccurate that its stupid. I don't like his style. Inglorious Basterds was probably my favorite film of his but even there I had some problems with his work - why is it narrated by some black dude but only for the first few scenes? And Hitlers face being shot to bits in the last scene. Stuff like that undermines believability. I can never find myself immersed in his movies because nothing flows.

- - - Updated - - -

People overrate it? I put it in the same category as Death Proof.

8.5 rating on IMDB.

 

[Nzoric]

I just tried watching Killing Season . Got half way through and I simply couldn't do it, what a stinking turd.

 

[JuveJay]

People overrate it? I put it in the same category as Death Proof.

Is it gore porn, then? I haven't seen Django yet.

 

[Ramin]

Django is a masterpiece!

Only a fool who are into Pacific Rim, Men of Steel, Avengers category of movies would not appreciate it's brilliance.

 

[The Curr]

Django was very good. Maybe not an all-time classic, but far better than most movies coming out.

 

[Nzoric]

Django is a masterpiece!

Only a fool who are into Pacific Rim, Men of Steel, Avengers category of movies would not appreciate it's brilliance.

Kurac masterpiece. It's a good movie but let's not exaggerate.

 

[ZoSo]

Django is a masterpiece!

Only a fool who are into Pacific Rim, Men of Steel, Avengers category of movies would not appreciate it's brilliance.

Pacific Rim is fucking great.

BADASS

 

[Klin]

Christoph Waltz' performance made Django a masterpiece.

 

[Fr3sh]

That Wolverine movie was SUPER disappointing.

 

[Monco]

Kurac masterpiece. It's a good movie but let's not exaggerate.

It's not a great movie, it's an amazing movie. This has been said by both the retards, who think that movies like Ted and The Avengers are the the greatest movies in the history of cinematography, and people, who value real movies. The only reason to call Django Unchained a "good" movie is if you didn't understand what this movie was all about and didn't notice those little things and references or Tarantino's movies are not your cup of tea. As Klin have said, Waltz' acting alone is what makes this movie already better than just "good".

 

[Nzoric]

It's not a great movie, it's an amazing movie. This has been said by both the retards, who think that movies like Ted and The Avengers are the the greatest movies in the history of cinematography, and people, who value real movies. The only reason to call Django Unchained a "good" movie is if you didn't understand what this movie was all about and didn't notice those little things and references or Tarantino's movies are not your cup of tea. As Klin have said, Waltz' acting alone is what makes this movie already better than just "good".

As a matter of a fact I'm a huge Tarantino buff, this is the first and only movie of his that I don't think is brilliant. Well, this and Death Proof but Death Proof was better. The performance of one actor cannot make the movie anything more than the script and storyline allows it to be, and Django was very limited.

It just struck me how obnoxious Tarantino fans can be, while I was reading your post. Now I'm rolling the tape back in my head to see if I've acted in a similar way.

 

[Dostoevsky]

Christoph Waltz' performance made Django a masterpiece.

Agreed.

The movie itself is decent. Worth watching, but I'd say it's overrated by the public.