This theme is fantastic, I agree. But that's because it's melodic, almost orchestral. A lot of movie score that I've heard people get excited about is totally different, like an abstract art painting, when you twist your head this way and that trying to figure out whether you see something or not.
Yeah, I get what you mean, and I agree. There's a lot of very forgettable stuff like that out there.
Much like the music in a rap song, to me a score has to be able to stand on its own to be worthwhile. Something I would listen to without the movie. (Which explains why most rap is hopeless.)
I don't know that I agree. A great score should be great in the context of the movie. If it stands up on its own, that's fine. I liked the score in The Dark Knight. I think it added atmosphere very well. I have it at home actually, but it's not good music on its own. It's interesting for me to listen to it and think about how it was used in the film, but just to play in the background? No thanks.
That movie bored the crap out of me, no offense.
None taken. We all have different tastes, and that film is very long, frequently slow and fairly stylised.
The thing these clips have in common is that they're.. glacial. They're like arias in an opera, where the guy spend half an hour reciting a poem about his distress. Which is fine, I suppose, long reflections on our life is part of what we do. But it doesn't make for the most exciting entertainment. Imagine these scenes without the music. They would be unbearable, unwatchable. To me, at any rate.
Leone is often compared to opera actually. Those scenes work for me partly because I watch them after spending two and a half hours building up to them - there's some emotional investment in the story, but mainly because of the score and the cinematography, which ratchet the tension to a climax. The final showdown in
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly consists mainly of shots of the three men straining at the leash, aching to pull the gun and shoot. It's all about the tension. The music adds to that enormously. That's what it's for. Otherwise, why play music over a film at all?
I saw an interview with George Lucas once where he debunked the myth that Star Wars was shown to the studio without the soundtrack in place and they hated it, but changed their minds when they saw it with that John Williams score. I can believe it. Picture that film in your head. How much does that huge orchestral theme make the film? How much of Darth Vader's menace is in the Imperial March?
Speaking of Williams, how crap would Jaws have been if not for that memorable two-note theme building tension
everywhere?
My favorite score is that which adds urgency to the action. You take an action scene which is already fast paced, full of stress, and you make it even more intense. But that absolutely does not fit into the kind of movie you're demoing here, so I don't think our conceptions of great score is much alike.
I think that sort of score can be great too, though a lot of it is relatively simple - a heavy base in something which builds seemingly neverendingly using techniques which have been familiar since at least Bach's time. (Interestingly, The Beetles dabbled in them too: check out Eleanor Rigby.)
:sob:
Bay presided over two movies that are among my absolute favorites score wise.
Don't confuse the scores and the directors (says he after a lengthy diatribe on Leone - it's different, honest). Bay is a hack action director -
this probably summarises what I dislike about him. That doesn't mean I don't like those scores. I do like Zimmer - in particular I adore Gladiator, not least for its score.
Now We Are Free is wonderful - it releases all of the tension at the end of the film and makes me tear up - victorious and mournful at the same time.
Actually, mentioning a Ridley Scott film reminds me of a related topic. Maybe this will be worth splitting off into its own thread. Does anyone have a film they adore which has a soundtrack they hate? For me, that's Blade Runner. The soundtrack does nothing for me.