not even in that case. barca wouldn't want a minusvalenza, and 31-year-old pjanic on a high book value isn't something we should accept.
psg can have arthur for paredes+$$$ if they want him.
But they have a minusvalenza already in Pjanic, no? His bookvalue was how much? 60 or 70M ? And with his age and current "level", how many % of those are they gonna recuperate you think?
In this debate you have consistently ignored Pjanic' book value and age + form, to draw the picture you want.
Please correct me if I am wrong on the above, Im not an expert on this type of accounting. But it simply doesnt compute for me that for 2 players traded for same value (more or less), where one who is at the end of his career (at least at top level) and CANT be traded for more than 10 peanuts, suddenly is the more valuable asset than one who is 24 yo and hopefully yet to enter his prime.