
Higuain is a better player than Icardi atm, and I just cant think of a worse way to spend 110m, giving our problems in midfield.
Morata or Martial would be better suited for CHL football under Allegri and they would cost a lot less.
Currently Higuain is better at shooting despite Icardi scoring more and Higuain is a better all around player BUT Higuain is very heavy in his movement and cant dribble past anyone anymore because of that while Icardi might not be Neymar when it comes to dribbling but since he is not as heavy as Higuain you can expect him more when trying to get past a player...
Should we have a choice between them (no money involved) Icardi should be better for us because Higuain is in decline and he will only become a weaker player (in terms of ability) over time while Icardi is younger and will last more...
That being said - I think adding 50M on top of Higuain for Icardi is madness and Im not sure it is worth it..
As for your "I just cant think of a worse way..." you are probably right as we have bigger problems to address such as our midfield
Morata - He has an upside but also a downside
Upside - He can dribble and is way faster than Higuain or Icardi while he can also help the build-up
Downside - Give him a full season and he will probably wont reach Higuain`s numbers... When we had Morata he was usually the sub of Mandzukic..
Its true things have changed since but the question remains - Can Morata lead our attack?! I dont know..
Martial is a different kind of animal - Martial instead of Higuain means a different type of play with our forwards - It means we change the way we feed the forwards and the way we attack as Dybala or Martial cant compete for headers like Higuain or Morata - Signing Martial if it happens will mean we are getting him as a LW in a 4-2-3-1 as I doubt we will play a 4-3-3 with D.Costa Dybala and Martial - Its just not the way we usually work..
