Mauro Camoranesi (27 Viewers)

[Lucky Luke]

yeah what?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[AnCa~JuVeGirl]

I don`t understand why Camo was changed with Iaquinta.....

 

[JCK]

He asked Ranieri because he wasn't feeling well.

 

[delpierofan82]

He asked Ranieri because he wasn't feeling well.

but why Iaquinta and not more defensive player?

 

[JCK]

but why Iaquinta and not more defensive player?

I can't answer this question but I can ask another question, why Iaquinta not instead of Del Piero 20 minutes before that?

 

[delpierofan82]

I can't answer this question but I can ask another question, why Iaquinta not instead of Del Piero 20 minutes before that?

Yes, that's also quite interesting

 

[Red]

but why Iaquinta and not more defensive player?

I can't answer this question but I can ask another question, why Iaquinta not instead of Del Piero 20 minutes before that?

I don't think anyone other than Ranieri can have any idea why he didn't make the obvious changes i.e Giovinco or Iaquinta fo Del Piero and Salihamidzic for Camoranesi.

 

[JCK]

I don't think anyone other than Ranieri can have any idea why he didn't make the obvious changes i.e Giovinco or Iaquinta fo Del Piero and Salihamidzic for Camoranesi.

If he were scared of putting Giovinco in such a game he could have put in Sali for Del Piero and moved Camo to play behind Amauri.

 

[Red]

There were any number of different options that would have made more sense than the ones he chose to make.

 

[JCK]

De Ceglie for Molinaro was great though.

 

[Red]

De Ceglie for Molinaro was great though.

In principle, yes.

The timing was odd though, because Molinaro had done okay in the second half after being his usual self in the first half.

I would have prefered to leave Molinaro on and put De Ceglie on for Nedved.

 

[Bjerknes]

Molinaro is probably one of the most fit players we have, because "he tries hard." It doesn't make sense to sub him late in the game unless he's getting owned badly.

So yeah, that was the wrong substitution at the time. Should have just started DC instead.

 

[DelpieroForLife]

De Ceglie for Molinaro was great though.

I can't find your post where you accuse you me of pointing at you so I just wanna clear things here.

Nothing is personal Jack... my post was directed towards the doooomed joke as I thought it was overused and silly, never wanted to attack you :malt:

 

[swag]

In principle, yes.

The timing was odd though, because Molinaro had done okay in the second half after being his usual self in the first half.

I would have prefered to leave Molinaro on and put De Ceglie on for Nedved.

I actually thought the opposite. In the first half Molinaro played some decent defense in preventing crosses and moving the ball upfield on a turnover here and there. In the second half he started to make turnovers -- bad ones -- and looked prime for a sub.

 

[Bjerknes]

Molinaro always looks prime for a sub, so it's weird the subbing never occurs between matches. :confused2:

 

[Ahmed]

also he was wincing and rotating his left shoulder, I think he picked up a niggle

 

[Esteban]

Molinaro got heavily owned by someone like Santana. That should tell us something.

 

[swag]

Molinaro got heavily owned by someone like Santana. That should tell us something.

Even worse, it was Carlos Santana.

 

[Ahmed]

Heyyy, Carlos is legendary!

 

[swag]

Heyyy, Carlos is legendary!

Yes, but not for his one-on-one play against defenders who start in Serie A.