Matthijs de Ligt (26 Viewers)

Snobist

DareDevil
Apr 16, 2017
13,287
This is good, both Bayern and Chelsea offering more than 70m. City might come with an offer in last minute. Juve will register profit about 30m if we sell above 70m.

- - - Updated - - -

Good. Milk them.
 
Last edited:

PhRoZeN

Livin with Mediocre
Mar 29, 2006
15,843
We paid 75 plus 10.5 in bonuses. So Bayern are pretty much getting the same.


Some factors to consider are since he joined us has he regressed or progressed. Tip it on the other side market valuation has inflated. I think we should negotiate for another 5m and then DDTS
 
OP

Cerval

Senior Member
Feb 20, 2016
26,829
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #5,138
    Not making a profit on his sale is unacceptable
    We'd be making a plusvalenza since his book value is a lot lower than the price for which we purchased him. We bought him for 5 years, we'd be selling for 2 remaining years at the price rumoured around, that would still be a good deal. It could be even better but still, we'll see how we pull the strings.
     

    Quetzalcoatl

    It ain't hard to tell
    Aug 22, 2007
    65,499
    We'd be making a plusvalenza since his book value is a lot lower than the price for which we purchased him. We bought him for 5 years, we'd be selling for 2 remaining years at the price rumoured around, that would still be a good deal. It could be even better but still, we'll see how we pull the strings.
    Plusvalenza yes, but I'm talking pure profit. What other club buys a 19 year old "generational talent" develops him for three years and sells him for the same price they got him. Bayern, Real, Chelsea would never.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 17)