but imo national football doesn't matter if it's ugly. you have limited time to prep players not used to playing with each other.
the goal is to win. so you support your national team no matter what
club imo is different because we watch it as hobby and give time and money to the club. demanding better entertainment is acceptable for time and money we put in.
I read an interesting article recently that explained the development of club football and how it originally stemmed from a very local level of tribalism before it got globalized.
It started off as identifying with the clubs from your city/county/neighborhood and the bragging rights that come with that. Some clubs represented labour movements and unions, the club for the poor (like Boca Juniors) vs the rich, grass root local rivalries with economic, social and political dimensions to it.
Then as some clubs became dominant they started tapping into larger fan bases that do not relate to that context.
Clearest contrast you can see today is visible in local derbies where one club is today a giant with international fan bases and the other is a minnow. Juve vs Turino for example. Or the Manchester derby before City had money.
For international fans it’s an insignificant game but for locals it’s something else. I’ll try to find the article it was in Arabic but had interesting factoids about the grass root origins of many clubs.
Point is club football was even more tribalistic and more about bragging rights (rather than entertainment) compared to international football. It used to tap into very local pride