Mafia: The Tuz-seidon Adventure (1 Viewer)

Hængebøffer

Senior Member
Jun 4, 2009
25,185
Its either or IMO, like if both are Gs, they go for one or the other, there is no need to risk exposure with erratic behaviour of voting for BOTH of them late, to force a needless tie, risky enough to pool votes in one direction. Unless we are ovestimating them and there was no organisation, just random noob voting on fellow Gs. Unless we are overthinking the analytical value of that night/late votings (another possibility is to look at the sudden surge for Sören), the most fishy ones are Fresh, Piotr, sheik and Melo. For tonight it was Gep and sören? (Gep I recall, forgot the other one).
I only vote one time and I do it late - today, it made me look bad.
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,953
Makes no sense whatsoever, they are losing one of them either way in that scenario, there is no gain to risk even more exposure by making late votes that gets most of the attention.
i didnt agree with it i just provided the likely reason. Analyze sheik's last vote from yesterday, he knew fully well that there just was no helping bezzy, the c's werent going to change votes with 2 minutes to go, and his buddy g's werent either
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,070
I only vote one time and I do it late - today, it made me look bad.
Your vote today is the least of your problems if Zach is a G. Your vote from yesterday will be a problem.

- - - Updated - - -

what do you mean? you keep saying we should lynch zach.
I believe that the D will investigate Zach today. I believe that I was investigated yesterday, not Ze.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Lovely game is this.

I give arguments against alen all day, people ignore.
Alen wants me lynched, half the pussy's get went and jump the cause.

It was a mistake thinking my horribly bad and his fantastic popularity on this forum would not count in this game.
Oh well
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)