Mafia: The Tuz-seidon Adventure (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Kate
- Start date
Nice misdirection 
I meant the Zach bit, you have had time to vote for him twice in a row, even when he was infront of the gallows, you choose otherwise.
I meant the Zach bit, you have had time to vote for him twice in a row, even when he was infront of the gallows, you choose otherwise.
She was too predictable and acted just like she did last time she was a G.
Well duh its good a G was voted out (was one of the first to vote for her before I had to go), but if the hypthetical scenario is she AND Zach are both Gs, and then their comrades have to choose between then, then it would explain some of the late votes she got, one of them is going anyways, get out the more exposed one while at the same time looking yourselves look better by "getting" a G.
If Zach is a G, then don't look for Janna's late votes only. Zach's late vote (Fresh) is just as suspicious.
If Zach's a G, there was probably a discussion who to be sacrificed. They wanted to make it a tie, so a coin toss will decide. But they overdid it. Janna got more votes, and Fresh had to act late to make it a tie again.
In any case, it's a long shot that depends on whether or not Zach is a G. If he isn't, everything I said goes down the drain.
If Zach's a G, there was probably a discussion who to be sacrificed. They wanted to make it a tie, so a coin toss will decide. But they overdid it. Janna got more votes, and Fresh had to act late to make it a tie again.
In any case, it's a long shot that depends on whether or not Zach is a G. If he isn't, everything I said goes down the drain.
Its either or IMO, like if both are Gs, they go for one or the other, there is no need to risk exposure with erratic behaviour of voting for BOTH of them late, to force a needless tie, risky enough to pool votes in one direction. Unless we are ovestimating them and there was no organisation, just random noob voting on fellow Gs. Unless we are overthinking the analytical value of that night/late votings (another possibility is to look at the sudden surge for Sören), the most fishy ones are Fresh, Piotr, sheik and Melo. For tonight it was Gep and sören? (Gep I recall, forgot the other one).
If Zach is a C, then Sheik's late vote for Janna is a problem.
The key lies in Zach's lynching. We can't act as we should if we don't find out his role. We just have to lynch Zach.
- - - Updated - - -
But have in mind, if what I said is correct, then the Gs were Janna, Zach, Melo and Sheik (plus three others). What do you expect from those four?
The key lies in Zach's lynching. We can't act as we should if we don't find out his role. We just have to lynch Zach.
- - - Updated - - -
But have in mind, if what I said is correct, then the Gs were Janna, Zach, Melo and Sheik (plus three others). What do you expect from those four?
Yeah I know, I didnt read last nights voting in real time, but in after hand, but it all seemed like amateur hour, wether its G or Cs, was just random BS except the token few suspicions vote timings ofcourse.
Main thing I disagree with your assessment is the need to go for a tie, makes no sense, they not smartest of the herd or most experienced, but there is no logical gain in forcing a tie between two comrades. Cs stupidity is also very likely occurance in such an event, noob Cs are most random and oblivious of all.
Main thing I disagree with your assessment is the need to go for a tie, makes no sense, they not smartest of the herd or most experienced, but there is no logical gain in forcing a tie between two comrades. Cs stupidity is also very likely occurance in such an event, noob Cs are most random and oblivious of all.