LIVE - Last hours of mercato (10 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nicholas

MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jan 30, 2008
38,737
Medical tomorrow.

Also Llorente said he's a great striker and he's happy he's coming.

Osvaldo has also reduced his salary to join aswell as rejecting Inter.
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
We cant sell Vucinic for 12 milion and $#@!ing Southampton pricing Osvaldo 18 mil and we consider it to be normal price.Mirko is miles ahead of Depp.Marotta again showing his incompetence when trying to sell.
Marotta did sell Matri for 11 mil... I'd say that was pretty competent. And Giach sold for a decent price. Most teams have trouble selling mediocre players around the age of 30. Vucinic would be hard to sell for 12 million for any side, seeing that he is on the wrong side of 30. Same with Quags.
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
68,978
Marotta did sell Matri for 11 mil... I'd say that was pretty competent. And Giach sold for a decent price. Most teams have trouble selling mediocre players around the age of 30. Vucinic would be hard to sell for 12 million for any side, seeing that he is on the wrong side of 30. Same with Quags.
selling matri for the amount we did was not through marotta's negotiating skills, it was through milan's incompetence of poor management, no other club in the world would have paid nearly that amount
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
unfortunately to say i think marotta will end up doing it, funding it through the sale of at least 2 of our forwards then compensate the attacking void by bringing back one of our loaned out forwards
You mean one of our young loaned out forwards that nearly 90% of this forum have screaming out to give a chance to?

So how would that necessarily be a bad thing?


Osvaldo is better than Vucinic or Quagliarella, their salaries come off the books, and then Juve brings up one of Gabbiandini, Berardi, or Boakye.

I can't see how that would be a bad thing, to be honest.
 

am0110

Senior Member
Jun 5, 2005
5,829
Mirko is 30 years old, though.
I have that in mind but I just think Mirko is much better player and yet Marotta is not able to sell him for the right price.I wonder who besides Pogba who is "one in a milion" talent, is Marotta able to sell for good price not to mention to sell for crazy money to Monaco and likes.
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
68,978
You mean one of our young loaned out forwards that nearly 90% of this forum have screaming out to give a chance to?

So how would that necessarily be a bad thing?


Osvaldo is better than Vucinic or Quagliarella, their salaries come off the books, and then Juve brings up one of Gabbiandini, Berardi, or Boakye.

I can't see how that would be a bad thing, to be honest.
i'd sooner not buy osvaldo send him a thank you card for 6 months of service, save ourselves 18 mill, sell whatever deadwood we can elsewhere whilst filling the attacking voids with the loaned out kids
 

Nicholas

MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jan 30, 2008
38,737
It's realistic to think we'll buy him in the Summer, but you can guarentee it will be for around 12-15 million, which if he does well, is fair.

Now to ship the trash trio out.
 

LiquidPLP

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2012
12,237
There's no point in coming him here. 6 strikers while Conte uses 2 actually and barely ever rotates.

IMO Marotta is using this situation to force Quag/Mirko/Gio leave the club. Maybe 2 of them hard to tell. The loan is cheap so it won't cost us much but could actually give an effect.

I don't think Marotta is going to spend 18-20m for him in the summer. He's penny pinching every deal he can and now suddenly he spends so much money carelessly? Maybe it's just that Conte wants all 3 bench strikers gone because they don't fit in 433 switch he's planning to do?

Osvaldo could be Llorente's replacement as CF in 433 too. I can't see him in Tevez's role no matter which formation we use.
 

am0110

Senior Member
Jun 5, 2005
5,829
Buying Tevez for 9mil and then paying 18mil on motherfvckin Osvaldo (if it happens ofc)!!!!
:lol2: Dat dere Bipolar disorder
That is what I have trouble with.I mean, all good work and saved money when buying Tevez Marotta can easily splash and squander if he opts to buyout Osvaldo.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
i'd sooner not buy osvaldo send him a thank you card for 6 months of service, save ourselves 18 mill, sell whatever deadwood we can, elsewhere whilst filling the attacking voids with the loaned out kids
I see what you are saying, but you are then spreading yourselves too thin at this point if your intention is to fill the attacking voids with 2 young players.

If one young player happens to falter under the wieght of the shirt, then fine, you still have ample cover, but if both fail to impress, you've got yourself a problem.

Believe me, I would love to see Gabbiadini and Berardi succeed here, but it's a big risk to have them both here at the same time, in the same season.
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
If we get Osvaldo for 15million or less, I'd be okay with that (assuming he does well this winter. Bring back Berardi in the summer. Primary subs to Llorente and Tevez, Osvaldo and Berardi. That's pretty awesome.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,005
I have that in mind but I just think Mirko is much better player and yet Marotta is not able to sell him for the right price.I wonder who besides Pogba who is "one in a milion" talent, is Marotta able to sell for good price not to mention to sell for crazy money to Monaco and likes.
Today we've seen that Mirko has rejected to move to 3-4 clubs. It has nothing to do with Marotta.

Arsenal wanted to loan him as well which Mirko rejected. It's not Marotta's fault they are not offering cash. Not any sane person would offer 12mln for a 30yo Mirko.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 8)