Last day of mercato: #FalcaON #FalcaOFF edition (25 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Maddy

Oracle of Copenhagen
Jul 10, 2009
16,545
We gave Udinese 1.5M this year.

After this year we can buy him for another 14M which is payable over 3 years.

If he meets certain goals by 2020 they get another 1.5M.

We didn't just dump 17M on their doorstep.
actually we did. you always write off the price of a player during his contract years.
 

DanTheMan5

Junior Member
Aug 1, 2014
249
I said committed 17m. Just cuz you don't pay it all at once doesn't mean it becomes less ffs.

Not obligated to buy him, and we earn more revenue across the longer payment period meaning it has much less of an impact on other purchases as opposed to 17m up front for him
 

MikeM

Footballing Hipster celebrating 4th place with Tuz
Sep 21, 2008
12,848
I said committed 17m. Just cuz you don't pay it all at once doesn't mean it becomes less ffs.
You're saying we should have used that 17M on someone else but only in Italy are you able to use the 17M over so many installments so in reality, we couldn't use this 17M on anyone you'd want.

We used 1.5M this year on Pereyra. Take that 1.5M and go buy someone else if you want.
 

italiacalcio10

Senior Member
Mar 3, 2014
3,866
Calcio fans need to wake up, we live in some kind of dream.This mercato shows that Italian football is on level of Portugal.
that's definitely not accurate. It's actually not even close. I understand the frustrations and understand why it may feel that way but to give some numbers:

Porto earns around 78 million in turnover. Club wages make up 70% of team expenses.
Benfica earns around 88 million on a good year (UCL year). Porto's wages are around 70% of revenue. Benfica seems to be closer to 60% but that is mostly due to player sales.

Juventus makes nearly 300 and spends around 60% on wages. Juve is practicing financial prudence. If you look at its financials, it's trying to turn a profit. Even lazio makes around 110 million euro and spends under 60% on wages without UCL. AS Roma makes 125 million, no EL or UCL, they do spend a lot on players though... They spend nearly 75% on wages. I'm surprised Roma is FFP compliant sometimes.

It's the bundlesliga that is the threat. Dortmund earns more revenue than us. Now they do sell a ton of players though that contributed to their high top line.

But Portugal...come on. They are in way worse shape than italy Economically. The one thing they do well is developing players and selling them for insane mark ups. Serie a teams do not do a good enough job here.
 

italiacalcio10

Senior Member
Mar 3, 2014
3,866
It's unfortunate because I actually think he'd kill it playing in the hole. He's played the wing at bayern buy in Switzerland he played central and he did for Basel too I believe. I think he'd be great plus he's so young. He also has his fitness down, which is so crucial. Nobody needs lazy players.

- - - Updated - - -
What about the league?
I think serie a is tougher this year. Many teams had write offs last year - lazio, ac milan, inter. Fiorentina was ravaged by injuries and while Rossi is hurt, they're in better shape with Marin, a healthy Gomez, a more mature caudrado and Micah Richards (and Rossi injury isn't as severe, but you can't count on him for the year) Roma is also better overall (however selling Benatia may really hurt them). Napoli is lateral IMO.

Also, I'd argue Palermo will give their opponents more trouble that Livorno. Udinese also seems better. Parma and Torino I would say have regressed.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Sooo... if Rabiot doesn't find a new club, he's ours?
this is an amazing question.

But didnt the french rapist connection signed him ?

- - - Updated - - -

It's unfortunate because I actually think he'd kill it playing in the hole. He's played the wing at bayern buy in Switzerland he played central and he did for Basel too I believe. I think he'd be great plus he's so young. He also has his fitness down, which is so crucial. Nobody needs lazy players.

- - - Updated - - -


I think serie a is tougher this year. Many teams had write offs last year - lazio, ac milan, inter. Fiorentina was ravaged by injuries and while Rossi is hurt, they're in better shape with Marin, a healthy Gomez, a more mature caudrado and Micah Richards (and Rossi injury isn't as severe, but you can't count on him for the year) Roma is also better overall (however selling Benatia may really hurt them). Napoli is lateral IMO.

Also, I'd argue Palermo will give their opponents more trouble that Livorno. Udinese also seems better. Parma and Torino I would say have regressed.
Imo Napoli stagnated and failed to fix their defensive issues, Roma took a step back with selling Benatia, but Lazio,Inter, Milan, Fiorentina and juventus all took steps forward
 

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
68,974
this is an amazing question.

But didnt the french rapist connection signed him ?

- - - Updated - - -



Imo Napoli stagnated and failed to fix their defensive issues, Roma took a step back with selling Benatia, but Lazio,Inter, Milan, Fiorentina and juventus all took steps forward
in what way did Juve take steps forward? and please don't use the "but we kept our assets" excuse because that only means we stood still. lazio took a step back the moment they hired pioli, roma still have an impressive team, bought in good players to still mount a serious challenge for the title
 

LiquidPLP

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2012
12,237
There are reports that Danny welbeck is at arsenal's training ground. Podolski still an option maybe ?
Geez we dodged a bullet with Hernandez, Biabiany is off to Milan so I was calm we're not going for any shitty players anymore. And then there's Podolski :sergio: he'll cost and earn too much here. Better stick to Pereyra and Coman then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 24)