Lampard to Juve? (17 Viewers)

Lamps to Juve?

  • Yay

  • Nay


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 28, 2007
83
Again .. I am glad you make your own judgments... most people do.

I said nothing about Lampard being a creative attacking mid, or an awesome defensive one. We have Zanetti and Nocerino for defensive mid, maby even Sissoko. For creative mids we are looking at VDV and Diego. What is wrong with bringing in an all around goal scoring mid who has had success with our current coach?

I am proud of you for not falling for all the media hype, well done.

Totti is a class player and many people agree on that, he does not win awards because he is not well liked as a person, which is unfair to him. But Lampard is class too, just different from Totti. You should compared VDV or someone to Totti if you want to rant about Totti.

As for thinking all Lampards goals are lucky deflections, are all Trez's goals flukes too? or Inzaghi's? Lampard also does his bit in ball possession and defense he just does not only hold the ball up or defend.

What I don't understand is why everyone thinks we can only buy one player.. VDv but no lamps.. Giovinco but no VDV. That is not how it works.
I would strongly lean towards donnanocerinos assessment, I don't know why everyone here is so freaked about the Lamp, (1) He's not special, (2) He damn well won't add anything close to an extra to our team, (3) He's not a leader, (4) He only plays a good game on favourable nights, (5) The only reason why they don't talk about his inadequacies is cos he's very lucky with deflections; they end up in the net. (6) In his team, he cant throw killer passes like Joe Cole, (7) Can't mark like Makelele, (8) He's not even as assertive as Mikel in the midfield. (9) He's not a striker but-yes he scores goals.

Trez doesn't score flukes, the only striker better than him in the box is Van Nistelrooy. Inzaghi is good too but not like Trez. Totti stopped being a midfielder a long time ago, he's the point man at Roma, he's their striker. Totti's a legend.

If lampard is not this

I said nothing about Lampard being a creative attacking mid, or an awesome defensive one.

And we don't need him because

We have Zanetti and Nocerino for defensive mid, maby even Sissoko

And

For creative mids we are looking at VDV and Diego.

Then why the hell do we need another midfielder to do the work of our strikers.

Do you think

bringing in an all around goal scoring mid who has had success with our current coach?

is a good enough reason to buy him, well, for me, not good enough.

If we have money to spend, then lets get midfielders that can do something relevant things for the team. Stuff like, creative play, providing killer passes for the strikers, covering and marking well, and scoring goals (with precision). I don't hate the Lamp, but I don't see why he's so important in our team. There's no space for him, he would just be another Tiago here, no disrespect, that's how I feel.
No Lamps,
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
I would strongly lean towards donnanocerinos assessment, I don't know why everyone here is so freaked about the Lamp, (1) He's not special, (2) He damn well won't add anything close to an extra to our team, (3) He's not a leader, (4) He only plays a good game on favourable nights, (5) The only reason why they don't talk about his inadequacies is cos he's very lucky with deflections; they end up in the net. (6) In his team, he cant throw killer passes like Joe Cole, (7) Can't mark like Makelele, (8) He's not even as assertive as Mikel in the midfield. (9) He's not a striker but-yes he scores goals.

Trez doesn't score flukes, the only striker better than him in the box is Van Nistelrooy. Inzaghi is good too but not like Trez. Totti stopped being a midfielder a long time ago, he's the point man at Roma, he's their striker. Totti's a legend.

If lampard is not this

I said nothing about Lampard being a creative attacking mid, or an awesome defensive one.

And we don't need him because

We have Zanetti and Nocerino for defensive mid, maby even Sissoko

And

For creative mids we are looking at VDV and Diego.

Then why the hell do we need another midfielder to do the work of our strikers.

Do you think

bringing in an all around goal scoring mid who has had success with our current coach?

is a good enough reason to buy him, well, for me, not good enough.

If we have money to spend, then lets get midfielders that can do something relevant things for the team. Stuff like, creative play, providing killer passes for the strikers, covering and marking well, and scoring goals (with precision). I don't hate the Lamp, but I don't see why he's so important in our team. There's no space for him, he would just be another Tiago here, no disrespect, that's how I feel. No Lamps.
Good post. He´d be useless here. I don´t see anything as his main strength. He´s just a good action midfielder and he is not good enough tactically and technically for Serie A. His characterisctics suit EPL the most. He is already 29/30, he would need time to adapt to Calcio and to his new teammates, he doesn´t have a long future, etc, etc...

I would take at least 3 Chelsea midfielders before him, if not more. Screw him, he is not worth the money nor the effort. Let him stay in Chelsea whre he can pretend he is the boss.
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
To all you mindless (yes you are mindless) people who think Lampard scores only lucky deflections. please have some common sense. when a guy scores 20 goals a season. Do you honestly believe that somehow all these goals came from deflections? If you honestly do then I suggest you go and meditate on your stupidity at thinking that somehow someone can score not 1, not 2, not 4, not 5 but 20 lucky deflections in a season.
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
Trezeguet scores more goals. What´s your point? If we want more goals, then we should sign strikers who are paid to do that job and they can do it better than Lamps.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
And even if he scores 20 lucky deflections every season,...wouldnt you take that? i mean 20 goals are 20 goals..whether they're exquisite bicycle kicks or deflections.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
Trezeguet scores more goals. What´s your point? If we want more goals, then we should sign strikers who are paid to do that job and they can do it better than Lamps.
The fact that you're actually trying to compare his goals scoring record to Trezeguets just shows how good a player Lampard is.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
I would rather take a creative midfield genius who can create for Trezeguet scoring 30 goals.
I actually agree..and i said it once and i'll say it again..I doubt Lampard will succeed in italy anyway..as he does seem to struggle when the tempo is slow..but to say he isnt a very good player is obvious bias(very good not WC) he might be a bit one dimensional but he sure as hell is useful for his team.
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
I actually agree..and i said it once and i'll say it again..I doubt Lampard will succeed in italy anyway..as he does seem to struggle when the tempo is slow..but to say he isnt a very good player is obvious bias(very good not WC) he might be a bit one dimensional but he sure as hell is useful for his team.
True. I know I have been talking nonsense bullshit about him and obviously being biased however I admit he is a good player. I just think that we won´t gain anything special with him and signing him could mean we lose out on other preferable targets and reduce playing time of our young stars. He is a big risk and just not a Juve type of player IMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 17)