Juve's transfer campaign so far... (9 Viewers)

[Marc]

Why are people on Amauri's back I just don't understand. Is it because he is toying with the Azzurri? Or because he might bench one of Giovinco-Iaquinta-Trezeguet-Del Piero? Or because he also considered a few other great clubs to join? Or because he costed us Lanzafame (stil ours though) and Nocerino (shit player) and some cash additionally? The guy is one of the hottest properties in Serie A right now and with better players in Juventus he will do wonders. Cronios, you weren't really serious that Boriello is better than Amauri, I hope? That's pure nonsense. And I am sure Amauri will have a better season than Ronnie, who I believe will flop like Rivaldo did.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Red]

Why are people on Amauri's back .

Because he is a Juve player and nothing this management does can possible be a good thing and so all of Milan, Inter, Roma and Fiorentina's summer dealings have been better than ours.

Look at the Senderos case. If we signed him everyone would say he is just another Boumsong, but because Milan have signed him he is a promising young CB.


The grass is always greener on the other side.

 

[v1rtu4l]

Flamini > Poulsen

that is probably true ... though i got to say that the ability to play cb is something that is very good for us (without so many quality center backs in our squad)

Ronaldinho+Borrielo > Amauri

del piero + trezeguet > kaka ...

i hope you see that it is bullshit to weigh two players against one ... they obviously can't substitute one of their players with dinho and borriello to add quality to the team, while we can simply exchange a striker with amauri

if you think that both players alone are better then amauri, then i just have to disagree. dinho is still not in form so it is a gamble and borrielo is really no way better than amauri (at least not for milan)

so judging just the preseason form we will have the better player

Zambro >= Melberg

Mellberg did quite well in the games i saw from him. he is if you want to make him really bad at least a mediocre serie a defender ...

i think you did not see many games from zambrotta and still got the wc2006 memories in mind... the latest blunder from zambrotta was in the international between austria and italy where he again was making mistakes that did lead directly to goal scoring chance for the opponent and i strongly feel that the second goal from austria (the volley) was also his man who was not marked tight enough and so could score ...

zambrotta is a liability .. he does continue were he left when he assisted mutu in the game against romania

Sheva > Knezevic

it remains to be seen if sheva does rediscover his form ... sheva does have more class than knezevic but if he plays like for chelsea then knezevic could be more important for us than sheva for milan

 

[Cronios]

Try to be objective and serious, PLEASE!!

You too Jack,
not everyone,bested us, but Milan surely did, better than us...
why are you always trying to make me look like a manic/lunatic?
Thats mockery!!!
I never said those things, just trying to point out the truth...
Those teams were in a better position than we were and they have done enough to keep the difference between us, every objective Juve fan can see this, among with the rest of the world...

Amauri proved nothing so far, he has never played in a team like and deliver, ever in his life,his value lies there, he is promising, but you cant judge his value of the deeds he might fulfill.
On the other hand is Ronaldinho, not some long time ago was voted the best football player and he really was one of the best this sport has ever seen, he is not thaaaat old, neither crippled,
it is not impossible that his form might partially return
And even if he doesnt be exactly the best player Milan will have, he might be useful, just a bit more than our 4th striker.

I mentioned two players, only to point out, that Milan bought not only better, but even more players than we did, quite the double actually!
That would maximize their chances to have more non-flop players, at least comparing their chances to ours.
Add Senderos and possibly someone else in that list and do the maths again.
Try to be objective please, i know its is hard for some ppl, but if it was Juve signing these players, i am sure ,that 99% of the forum would go wild and declare that the CL is certainly ours!!!


v1rtu4l get REAL ffs
honestly is there even a way to compare the value of Knezevic and Sheva, for real???
Are you serious???
If you really believe this, i have nothing else to talk about with you, for good.
Seriously, how low some ppl might go to defend their hopeless dreams??
We are judging the summer transfer of Milan and Juve and you guys are trying to convince yours selves that someone like Knezevic is a better transfer than someone Sheva!!!

You ppl are beyond help, sanity is a privilege all lost to you...

Honestly answer me, answer your self,
if we were signing Flamini, Senderos, Zambro, Sheva and Ronaldinho

and Milan were singing Poulsen, Amauri, Mellberg and Knezevic
who would you vote as the better mercato player???
Is there a possibility for any sane person to vote the second pair of players???
I am not accusing anyone for the sake of it, the difference is simply too evident/overwhelming for everyone bar some Juventini minds to see...

 

[JCK]

I'm not mocking you, I was being realistic. We're doomed.

 

[The Arif]

I wish we g=could get someone, half as good as Riise..

We already have someone half as good as Riise. It's Molinaro. Seriously, you're overrating Riise here. He's a decent LB but far from being a great LB.

 

[Lion]

exactly.

 

[Enron]

Riise is better at left mid anyway.

 

[Cronios]

We already have someone half as good as Riise. It's Molinaro. Seriously, you're overrating Riise here. He's a decent LB but far from being a great LB.

Molinaro is not even a football player to begin with...

 

[Lion]

Riise is better at left mid anyway.

even then he's not that much anyway besides the occasional cannon shots.

 

[Cronios]

I'm not mocking you, I was being realistic. We're doomed.

We are not doomed, as long as our old guard bears breath:juve1:

I am only pointing out that the odds are against us, we have less chances to compete for a title with the other teams, than best us, but life and football are hardly ever fair, luck, determination and many other factors might cause extreme results and twist the natural cause of things, esp in cup type of competitionsimp:

 

[Enron]

even then he's not that much anyway besides the occasional cannon shots.

He's best when he can go forward without responsibility. Like in 2005 and 2006. That's why I think he'll be good at Roma. He was indeed crap last year.

 

[Cronios]

Enron do you honestly think that such a useless excuse of a "player", like Molinaro, could play in Pool?

 

[Enron]

Enron do you honestly think that such a useless excuse of a "player", like Molinaro, could play in Pool?

Honesly, I've only seen him play like 10 or 12 times. That said I've seen Riise play probably 100 or so. I've seen John Arne play much better than he did last season. So I'm biased because I've only seen Molinaro enough times to know that he can play ok. That said, I don't think Molinaro could play at Pool, then again I haven't seen him much.

 

[Lion]

Why are people on Amauri's back?

It's quite simple. They are jealous because they don't have an awesome hair style + goatee combo that he has.

 

[Cronios]

Honesly, I've only seen him play like 10 or 12 times. That said I've seen Riise play probably 100 or so. I've seen John Arne play much better than he did last season. So I'm biased because I've only seen Molinaro enough times to know that he can play ok. That said, I don't think Molinaro could play at Pool, then again I haven't seen him much.

Evasive but wise

 

[Lucky Luke]

Honesly, I've only seen him play like 10 or 12 times. That said I've seen Riise play probably 100 or so. I've seen John Arne play much better than he did last season. So I'm biased because I've only seen Molinaro enough times to know that he can play ok. That said, I don't think Molinaro could play at Pool, then again I haven't seen him much.

why not
Traore did it

 

[Enron]

why not
Traore did it

And we finished 5th. And I don't think he'd start over Aurellio or Dossena.

 

[Osman]

Hahaha, well spotted. Traore was a pathetic and horrifying player, most top teams has had an abysmal player now and then, the general difference is how quickly you get rid of those players.

 

[Cronios]

why not
Traore did it

O, another reason to envy Portsmouthimp: