Juan Manuel Iturbe Arévalos - Winger - Hellas Verona (12 Viewers)

Would you like to see Iturbe at Juve at these rumored numbers?

  • YES

  • No!


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

AOD4

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2004
3,861
26.5 million euro is peanuts compared to what the rest of Europe is paying for a AM. But what surprise me is why now, Marotta didn't wanna pay for Sanchez when he left Udinese, for Aguero, for Dzeko,but suddenly he decides to go all the way for Iturbe. This will be the first time Marotta breaks the 20 million mark, and this kid is not even an international. It's interesting to see what this kid brings to the team, as so far I haven't been impressed by him. He reminds me of Aaron Lennon and Obafemi.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Ahmed

Principino
Sep 3, 2006
47,928
^^ because we had a squad with a lot of holes and crappy players in those days, it is only now where we can start making expensive signings since the squad is pretty much or can be made complete with some smart signings.
 

frzl

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2006
3,718
well Porto made a tidy profit for him, Verona will get a small profit
eh? porto bought him for 4.25m in january 2011, so they paid 4m for a 17 year old.
they took quite a high risk and sold him 3.5 years later for 15m. in between they earned 2.5m from loans and afaik never actually used iturbe...
compared to that verona took him on loan for 1 year, he was an absolute key player for them and now they are guaranteed like a 10m+ profit without having ever had to take a real risk whatsoever...

i think verona really got the better of it ^^. not to mention that porto just sold a player for 15m who will go for 25m+ now :p


what i don´t get in this whole thing is iturbe´s role... he said he wants to play cl and praised juve in interviews.
now the negotiations are at a quite advanced stage and juve seems to have made a more than fair offer... why doesn´t he just come out and say "i want juve and only juve?".
why is he risking to get sold to milan who don´t even play in EL?
all according to reports obviously ^^
 

Ocelot

Midnight Marauder
Jul 13, 2013
18,943
eh? porto bought him for 4.25m in january 2011, so they paid 4m for a 17 year old.
they took quite a high risk and sold him 3.5 years later for 15m. in between they earned 2.5m from loans and afaik never actually used iturbe...
compared to that verona took him on loan for 1 year, he was an absolute key player for them and now they are guaranteed like a 10m+ profit without having ever had to take a real risk whatsoever...

i think verona really got the better of it ^^. not to mention that porto just sold a player for 15m who will go for 25m+ now :p


what i don´t get in this whole thing is iturbe´s role... he said he wants to play cl and praised juve in interviews.
now the negotiations are at a quite advanced stage and juve seems to have made a more than fair offer... why doesn´t he just come out and say "i want juve and only juve?".
why is he risking to get sold to milan who don´t even play in EL?
all according to reports obviously ^^
Burning bridges is never a smart move. He'd take a big risk himself, not to mention the harm he'd do to Verona.

And one of the benefits if buying such a young player, besides the wages, is the resale value. Even if he flops, we can still sell him in 2 seasons for like 10 million. With a then 29 year old flopping Nani on high wages, good luck.
 

frzl

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2006
3,718
goal.com :touched:
i just glanced through it but it looks like this thread all over again:
- "should have JUST bought sanchez"
- completely ignoring wages
- just assuming that sanchez could have been bought easily before the world cup
 

LiquidPLP

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2012
12,237
It's definitely a risk none is denying that. I'm not sure it's Marotta's fault he didn't sign Sanchez before WC. Barca aren't dumb they knew it's better to sell after the WC.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,916
goal.com :touched:
i just glanced through it but it looks like this thread all over again:
- "should have JUST bought sanchez"
- completely ignoring wages
- just assuming that sanchez could have been bought easily before the world cup
Barcelona were never going to sell him before the World Cup, because frankly that is moronic.

We get this every single time we are linked with a big player. 'Juventus can sign him for €xxm'. Then comes the news how we have offered something pathetic, and how we can sign the player in 5 minutes if we just go up to this magical and perfectly reasonable round figure. It's bollocks, big players go to auction and highest bidder. It's not in the interests of the selling club to do otherwise.

I honestly don't know why people continue to get caught up in this game.
 

Mister

Senior Member
Apr 4, 2014
5,742
Source - GDS FUll STORY :D

Marotta when he was asked about Juve's last bid (23m) for Iturbe " we will not go over, that's for sure"

Juve's offer of 21m + Quagliarella is also still on the table & Fabio has agreed to join Verona if the deal formalizes.

Verona are asking for 27m for Iturbe, but if a 25m offer is made by Juventus then it would be very difficult for them to say no.

Marotta does not believe Milan made a 28m bid for Iturbe

Juve only will offer 25m but Marrone could be replaced over Quag

Today Verona will meet again with Juventus. Verona ds Sogliano last night evaluated Juve & Milan's offers & for now Verona says "NO".
 

LiquidPLP

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2012
12,237
Iturbe is not worth 26 mil end of story.

I don't think Marotta should go for this deal tbh
It's not true. He's worth what some club is able to pay for him. If Verona says it's too little they have every right to do so.

It seems our management rates him highly; more than you do. That's it. I also think it's too much but I can't see alternatives tbh. After all those aren't my money and my responsibility :D
 

Gerd

Senior Member
Dec 25, 2011
5,955
Barcelona were never going to sell him before the World Cup, because frankly that is moronic.

We get this every single time we are linked with a big player. 'Juventus can sign him for €xxm'. Then comes the news how we have offered something pathetic, and how we can sign the player in 5 minutes if we just go up to this magical and perfectly reasonable round figure. It's bollocks, big players go to auction and highest bidder. It's not in the interests of the selling club to do otherwise.

I honestly don't know why people continue to get caught up in this game.
Story of our mercato summed up in one sentence :lol: . I hope it doesn't end up the same way with iturbe . It began nicely , but now it is starting to show the usual patterns :shifty:
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Offcourse, its an idiot side with articles that are only plausible to idiots

goal.com :touched:
i just glanced through it but it looks like this thread all over again:
- "should have JUST bought sanchez"
- completely ignoring wages
- just assuming that sanchez could have been bought easily before the world cup
And the idea sells so well. Check the wishlist thread. Check these people who went like "just offer sanchez that 25/30mil and get him before the wc"

Why on earth would a team sell a player for peanuts, when weeks later, there is the biggest stage in the world for him, to show himself and boost the price ?

I also love how people assume "look if we offer xxmil, we get him now". Erm, no. Teams can just drag the deal out untill someone comes along that offers what they deem is acceptable

Is it supposed to be just 23m or 23m and Quag?
23mil i think, FI mentionned the 21+quag as alternative. Not sure tho
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 10)