Juan Guillermo Cuadrado - RWB/RM/LM - Chelsea (22 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,988
No option is not ideal, because if he has a great season we will probably end up being outbid by someone else. Unless he did something like try to force through the move here.

Anyway, purple rats are going to be seething.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
It's a 1.5 million Euro risk, no matter how you look at it.

Option, no option, obligation. At the end of the season, that is all that this will have cost Juve.

If he works out, great. Then they can talk next summer about an actual transfer. If it doesn't work out, then so be it. It was a low cost move. I don't really see a downside to any of this.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,988
We surely have to be bringing Berardi back next season, so the dry loan isn't going to make much difference long term unless he looks like Garrincha for a season.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
We surely have to be bringing Berardi back next season, so the dry loan isn't going to make much difference long term unless he looks like Garrincha for a season.
At the very worst, he is a stop gap solution until Berardi comes here next year.

At least this guy was quite good in Serie A, unlike some other one year reinforcements (Anelka, Bendtner)
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
no option is some feeder club bullshit
Why would you want an option? What is the difference? I would have been far more concerned if it were an obligation. Just because there is no option does not mean that they can't negotiate next summer. And as @JuveJay mentioned, this could very well be a stopgap for Berardi.
 

Liviu

Senior Member
Jan 10, 2015
992
Loans with no option to buy are deals where the club doesn't trust 100% the player because the player isn't and most likely will not be their and the player isn't motivated to give 100% because he's in no man's land. This looks more like a quantity signing because of the missing clause.
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,839
Why would you want an option? What is the difference? I would have been far more concerned if it were an obligation. Just because there is no option does not mean that they can't negotiate next summer. And as @JuveJay mentioned, this could very well be a stopgap for Berardi.
big difference, in case of an option we get to have an incentive for carrying all the risk, in this case chelsea is winning on all fronts, they get 1.5 mil, wages paid and possibly a recoup of their investment in full.

- - - Updated - - -

Loans with no option to buy are deals where the club doesn't trust 100% the player because the player isn't and most likely will not be their and the player isn't motivated to give 100% because he's in no man's land. This looks more like a quantity signing because of the missing clause.

option is not obligation
 

mukumsplau

Senior Member
Jul 9, 2008
4,443
they say ppl change when they come into money...before the 100mil and CL final came most on here was tearing there foreskins fapping at cuadrado...and now?

i trust marotta, patarici and company...regardless of whether its a player u prefer or not its all a gamble...but i appreciate that MarPatAng (marotta patarici agnelli) is addressing obvious holes in LB, CAM and overall attacking thrust

if anyone runs long distance here there are times on the course u need to conserve a lil and times where u launch out..but this comes after knowing ur limitations..

forza juve
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,789
big difference, in case of an option we get to have an incentive for carrying all the risk, in this case chelsea is winning on all fronts, they get 1.5 mil, wages paid and possibly a recoup of their investment in full.

- - - Updated - - -




option is not obligation
Do we know for sure that Juve are fronting the whole wage bill?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 22)