Israeli-Palestinian conflict (59 Viewers)

Is Hamas a Terrorist Organization?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should there be a Jewish nation SOMEWHERE in the world?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should Israel be a country located in the region it is right now?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,795
It was in reference to the claim from the movie "Defamation" that the jewish holocaust was the worst one in history, which is an inaccurate historical fact. Whether we like it or not, it's simply twisting history to say that the jewish holocaust was the worst genocide in history, it's a blatant lie and it's being exploited to this day. "Defamation" pretty much confirms what I figured, that the Israeli media, education and social services are creating a "Us vs. them" mentality for the kids from an early age, partly by using this historically inaccurate fact. I think it's a legitimate beef for a historian to have, if you want to call me a level headed clown on the basis of that then so be it.
My point being that using body count as determining the "worst holocaust" (as if that implies there are "good holocausts" and "less good ones") is absurd.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,667
My point being that using body count as determining the "worst holocaust" (as if that implies there are "good holocausts" and "less good ones") is absurd.
Holocausts in general seem like suckage, even before you start bagging the bodies.

- - - Updated - - -

Anonymous declares war on Israel. 45 million cyber attacks since beginning of Gaza Offensive...

http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/19/tech/web/cyber-attack-israel-anonymous/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
 

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,877
My point being that using body count as determining the "worst holocaust" (as if that implies there are "good holocausts" and "less good ones") is absurd.
Well that's your beef with the historical method. By using "worst" when describing a genocide you don't imply anything about the methods nor do you use it to weigh sincerity and how severe it is, "worst" is simply the one with the highest body count i.e. the one with furthest fetching repercussions.

My attack problem with the Israeli use of "worst genocide" (they certainly mean it in terms of numbers, blatantly obvious from the movie and other sources) is that it's a false statement and it's being used today as a means to legitimization of the Israeli actions. It's bullshit, and debunking that myth would signal a start to dismantling this creation which is Israel and it's history. But I guess I'm a level headed idiot, it's much easier to sit on the fence and just lift your hands whenever facts are being discussed while history runs it path using a broken GPS. I'm sorry if you have a beef with the terminology, but those are the valid terms today.
 

Raz

Senior Member
Nov 20, 2005
12,218
Well that's your beef with the historical method. By using "worst" when describing a genocide you don't imply anything about the methods nor do you use it to weigh sincerity and how severe it is, "worst" is simply the one with the highest body count i.e. the one with furthest fetching repercussions.

My attack problem with the Israeli use of "worst genocide" (they certainly mean it in terms of numbers, blatantly obvious from the movie and other sources) is that it's a false statement and it's being used today as a means to legitimization of the Israeli actions. It's bullshit, and debunking that myth would signal a start to dismantling this creation which is Israel and it's history. But I guess I'm a level headed idiot, it's much easier to sit on the fence and just lift your hands whenever facts are being discussed while history runs it path using a broken GPS. I'm sorry if you have a beef with the terminology, but those are the valid terms today.
No mate, you're just young.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,795
Well that's your beef with the historical method. By using "worst" when describing a genocide you don't imply anything about the methods nor do you use it to weigh sincerity and how severe it is, "worst" is simply the one with the highest body count i.e. the one with furthest fetching repercussions.
That's absolutely the case. An entire race of 3 million people could be completely eradicated from the earth. Eradicated. But by this bogus measure, it's only "half" as bad as the Jewish genocide of the 20th century. That's idiocy.

My attack problem with the Israeli use of "worst genocide" (they certainly mean it in terms of numbers, blatantly obvious from the movie and other sources) is that it's a false statement and it's being used today as a means to legitimization of the Israeli actions. It's bullshit, and debunking that myth would signal a start to dismantling this creation which is Israel and it's history. But I guess I'm a level headed idiot, it's much easier to sit on the fence and just lift your hands whenever facts are being discussed while history runs it path using a broken GPS. I'm sorry if you have a beef with the terminology, but those are the valid terms today.
They are not valid in my mind. Calling them valid to begin with just reinforces the deception.

If the argument is made by the application of industrialization technologies to the manufacture of mass murder, then I think the Israelis could have a case. But using sheer body count is asinine and a false measure.
 

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,877
That's absolutely the case. An entire race of 3 million people could be completely eradicated from the earth. Eradicated. But by this bogus measure, it's only "half" as bad as the Jewish genocide of the 20th century. That's idiocy.
That's a valid beef, but when I write here I don't really take the time to cover all corners or aspects of the problem at hand - i presume that it's in place when I make my point otherwise I would have to sit 20 hours a day when posting on Tuz :D . The historical method doesn't just stop at "worst", I trust you know that.
 
OP

ReBeL

The Jackal
Jan 14, 2005
22,871
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #10,236
    Try to live one day like this


    - - - Updated - - -

    For those of you who want to follow this minute by minute, here is one of the Palestinian pages
    http://www.facebook.com/FreePalestine2016

    - - - Updated - - -

    Anyway, there is nothing called ceasefire yet...
    The number of martyrs so far is 137. The number of injuries is 1100.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 47)