Israeli-Palestinian conflict (43 Viewers)

Is Hamas a Terrorist Organization?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should there be a Jewish nation SOMEWHERE in the world?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Should Israel be a country located in the region it is right now?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,447
once again please show the same skepticism when palestinians suicide bomb an israeli cafe
That's a false analogy. But I understand what you mean I guess.

Seven is spewing bullshit as always.

So, your saying the people in the convoy, their primary objective was provocation? Humanitarian aid was just a secondary objective to them?

How are they not innocent people really, even if we suppose what you are saying is true, and they were provoking Israel, does it really justify killing them?
I am almost 100% certain that humanitarian aid was a secondary objective, yes. It does not justify killing them and I didn't say it did. But they're nowhere near as innocent as they are portrayed.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,112
ßüякε;2516196 said:
It means my life is better than many others, so they should commit suicide.

Why don't you and I set up a date and commit suicide together?

:heart:
Your life is better than others? How do you know that? What is "better" anyway? How do we know who has a "better" life than the other? Or does "better" mean, materially better?

That's a false analogy. But I understand what you mean I guess.



I am almost 100% certain that humanitarian aid was a secondary objective, yes. It does not justify killing them and I didn't say it did. But they're nowhere near as innocent as they are portrayed.
I think i was wrong about you before, Alen always told me how smart you were, and i always said that he overestimated you. But like i said, i was wrong, you really are smart. I mean the way you can spin things, you can make an attack on a humanitarian aid ship sound somewhat justified. That isn't easy i have to give it you.

What made you think their primary objective was to provoke btw? I mean, some of the people there were Europeans that were neither Muslim nor Arab?
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,447
Your life is better than others? How do you know that? What is "better" anyway? How do we know who has a "better" life than the other? Or does "better" mean, materially better?



I think i was wrong about you before, Alen always told me how smart you were, and i always said that he overestimated you. But like i said, i was wrong, you really are smart. I mean the way you can spin things, you can make an attack on a humanitarian aid ship sound somewhat justified. That isn't easy i have to give it you.

What made you think their primary objective was to provoke btw? I mean, some of the people there were Europeans that were neither Muslim nor Arab?
That's twisting words. I have always maintained it was wrong.

I think they wanted to provoke, because they knew it was going to happen. Also, it's not easy to know what operation people are running on a ship, so the circumstances were ambiguous. If their goal was humanitarian aid alone, they could have done a much better job.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,112
That's twisting words. I have always maintained it was wrong.

I think they wanted to provoke, because they knew it was going to happen. Also, it's not easy to know what operation people are running on a ship, so the circumstances were ambiguous. If their goal was humanitarian aid alone, they could have done a much better job.
They did the best job they could. When Egypt said that it won't allow aid convoys to pass through them a few months back, Galloway said that they'd take the sea alternative, and thats what they did. Someone had to do something to help Gaza's people.

No surprises here though, we know you don't give a shit about what the people of Gaza are going through.
 
OP

ReBeL

The Jackal
Jan 14, 2005
22,870
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #7,171
    I am almost 100% certain that humanitarian aid was a secondary objective, yes. It does not justify killing them and I didn't say it did. But they're nowhere near as innocent as they are portrayed.
    I'm 120% sure they were going there to be killed.
     
    Apr 12, 2004
    77,164
    That's twisting words. I have always maintained it was wrong.

    I think they wanted to provoke, because they knew it was going to happen. Also, it's not easy to know what operation people are running on a ship, so the circumstances were ambiguous. If their goal was humanitarian aid alone, they could have done a much better job.
    Agree.
    They did the best job they could. When Egypt said that it won't allow aid convoys to pass through them a few months back, Galloway said that they'd take the sea alternative, and thats what they did. Someone had to do something to help Gaza's people.

    No surprises here though, we know you don't give a shit about what the people of Gaza are going through.
    No, they didn't because they fucked it all up.
    I'm 120% sure they were going there to be killed.
    That's mathematically impossible.
     

    Fred

    Senior Member
    Oct 2, 2003
    41,112
    ßüякε;2516226 said:
    Agree.

    No, they didn't because they fucked it all up.


    That's mathematically impossible.
    They underestimated the Israeli's ability to commit such inhumane acts, thats where they fucked up imo. You should expect anything from that mob of thieves and murderers.
     

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    Jun 25, 2003
    39,447
    They did the best job they could. When Egypt said that it won't allow aid convoys to pass through them a few months back, Galloway said that they'd take the sea alternative, and thats what they did. Someone had to do something to help Gaza's people.

    No surprises here though, we know you don't give a shit about what the people of Gaza are going through.
    Quite the opposite. You want to make it emotional and that's fine by me, but it's not going to help your cause. That's why manifestations don't work. You need people in the higher echelons and to get there you need to be rational. Instead you choose to sit here and say "what a disgrace, poor palestinians". And then you condemn me for not crying with you. But okay, if you want to make the argument that I'm an ass, fine, you go ahead.
     

    GordoDeCentral

    Diez
    Moderator
    Apr 14, 2005
    71,075
    Quite the opposite. You want to make it emotional and that's fine by me, but it's not going to help your cause. That's why manifestations don't work. You need people in the higher echelons and to get there you need to be rational. Instead you choose to sit here and say "what a disgrace, poor palestinians". And then you condemn me for not crying with you. But okay, if you want to make the argument that I'm an ass, fine, you go ahead.
    you make sense, and you speak the truth, but since you recognize this is still fresh and making some emotional, your rational assessment should take into account some tact if indeed your purpose is to convince people of the righteousness of your ways.
     

    Seven

    In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
    Jun 25, 2003
    39,447
    Please enlighten them on how to do that.
    You make sure everyone knows you're going to go there. Every news agency out there should know. Israel know you're going there for humanitarian aid. Everyone knows who exactly is on board of your ship. Your route is known, your time of departure is known. Everything.

    Now see if Israel shoots you.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 27)