Nope, that way you make Israel weaker, Palestinians stronger, and the wars will continue simply because the Palestinians won't accept the current situation with how's the land shared. And it will become even more ugly because now they won't be so helpless anymore.
Palestinians won't accept to leave the land lost in 1967 to Israel, while Israel won't accept giving it back to the Palestinians.
Palestinians won't accept to leave the land lost in 1967 to Israel, while Israel won't accept giving it back to the Palestinians.
Palestinians in 1988 under Arafat made a strategic painful decision to be satisfied with getting back the lands occupied in 1967, which are the West Bank and Gaza, which are 22% of historical Palestine, and accept an Israeli state beside the Palestinian state. On this base, Madrid conference for peace took place in 1991, and in 1993 Oslo agreement was signed by the two parties, but with time passing, it was so clear for Palestinians that Israelis were not serious about withdrawing from the West Bank and Gaza, as they only withdrew from the cities and not from the rural areas making the Palestinian lands separate points that have no authority and no independence and hundreds of checkpoints were waiting for people out of the cities to go from one city to another one.
People were fed up with that trick of Oslo sponsored by USA seeing the Zionist settlements being built on their lands in the West Bank and Gaza as if no peace was supposed to go on, but Arafat could control all the rage under his hands because he knew how to be so diplomatic to all the Palestinian parties. In Camp David in 2000, Clinton brought Arafat and Israeli Barak and told them that they should make a final agreement. Arafat wondered about the form of the Palestinian state. The American suggestion was so silly that even Arafat rejected it. Clinton told him to stop asking for Jerusalem and to tell Palestinian refugees abroad to forget any hope of coming back to their lands ever. Arafat refused and said to Clinton: "No Palestinian leader can do that because simply he will be shot down before going back to Ramallah by one of the Palestinian refugees in this world that was hoping for all his life years to live in a dignity".
We all know how Arafat was sieged in his building in Ramallah for two years, and Israeli bulldozers were visiting him on a weekly basis to make him surrender his principles, but he didn't. Sharon, the Israeli criminal decided to kill Arafat to pave the way for more modest Palestinian leaders to lead the Palestinian hierarchy in order to enable Israelis to keep expansion making it look as if Palestinians don't refuse that at all. Arafat was poisoned by a very weird way, and Abbas came instead of him. Palestinians were so shocked with the murder of Arafat that they didn't care that much who succeeded him but after a while they knew it was an Israeli plan implemented by some of those who were around Arafat.
Here came Hamas when it refused corruption that spreaded all over the West Bank and Gaza, and fought against those who wanted to give Palestine, all Palestine on a golden plate to Israeli criminals. Hamas decided to compete in the elections, and Fatah, the corrupt party, didn't take it seriously that Hamas may win, so they allowed them to participate. Hamas DID win and the whole world was shocked with that. It was NOT an indication for Hamas familiarity, but rather the people's hatred for Abbas and his corrupted and traitor gang.
And you know the rest of the story.
Sorry for the very long post, but I felt that I had to write it.
