Iraq. Is it better now?? (AKA ISIS/ISIL/IS/name-of-the-week-here) (12 Viewers)

Is Iraq better now?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

AndreaCristiano

Nato, Vive, e muore Italiano
Jun 9, 2011
19,125
I disagree. IMO, it started with the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. Dollars debasin', neggaz be wastin', nobody be caring.

Insert one of many Tom Jefferson quotes.
especially since without the gold standard we can just open the printing press and make shit up as we go

- - - Updated - - -

To be honest I think that the USA is just too big to govern well. Decentralization is needed.
That was the original intent stronger states and the centralized government was only for defence and currency basically but over the years the politicos have centralized more and more power and minimized the states
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,750
especially since without the gold standard we can just open the printing press and make shit up as we go
The Immutable Value of Gold is a fairy tale and nothing more.

It's as if gold has magical properties that make it immune to human speculation and irrational value judgements. Might as well have a Kryptonite standard.

Unless maybe if you're a leprechaun. Just as real.
 

AndreaCristiano

Nato, Vive, e muore Italiano
Jun 9, 2011
19,125
The Immutable Value of Gold is a fairy tale and nothing more.

It's as if gold has special properties that make it immune to human speculation and irrational value judgements. Might as well have a Kryptonite standard.
no thats not the point, when you had a certain amount ie value of Gold in the vault you could not print more than the gold you had to back up that currency. Now without the gold standard we can print all we want and deflate the dollar
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,750
Even so, and even if in this modern era gold is replaced with DJIA index funds, I'm not sure which economic system rewards tons of assets being stockpiled in the closet instead of being used.
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
gold will be soon replaced with clean drinking water anyway.

by 2029, usa's drinking water shortage is going to be a big problem...... which means canada will be making a shit ton of money and becoming the biggest superpower in the region/world

and let's face it, with how fucked up the world is thanks to countries like usa, russia, saudi, china, japan, korea, england..etc. the wrold could use a lot more canada
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
you can't even protect your own school children from reatrded kids with weapons, how you plan to invade the great white north.



fucking lol
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,979
The Immutable Value of Gold is a fairy tale and nothing more.

It's as if gold has magical properties that make it immune to human speculation and irrational value judgements. Might as well have a Kryptonite standard.

Unless maybe if you're a leprechaun. Just as real.
Gold is a tangible asset with limited quantities across the globe. Fiat currencies are practically unlimited due to printing from central banks. Therefore, gold is obviously intrinsically more sound the fiat currencies.

Even so, and even if in this modern era gold is replaced with DJIA index funds, I'm not sure which economic system rewards tons of assets being stockpiled in the closet instead of being used.
DJIA is all based on manipulation, and all companies can go to zero.
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
kyle, you have never even left your little backwards cack hole of a town, what would you know abot world politics
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,526
The Immutable Value of Gold is a fairy tale and nothing more.

It's as if gold has magical properties that make it immune to human speculation and irrational value judgements. Might as well have a Kryptonite standard.

Unless maybe if you're a leprechaun. Just as real.
This.

arizona can't even handle alc's entire family and relatives crossing the border.
Stfu bitch.

That was the original intent stronger states and the centralized government was only for defence and currency basically but over the years the politicos have centralized more and more power and minimized the states
Then who's to say USA wouldn't have turned into something like the EU?

There will always be a sense of unfairness especially considering that money runs things. I know that's a stupid statement but it's just to show that the system in place is fine, it's the people running the system that are to blame.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 11)