Iraq. Is it better now?? (AKA ISIS/ISIL/IS/name-of-the-week-here) (5 Viewers)

Is Iraq better now?

  • Yes

  • No

Results are only viewable after voting.
Bjerknes

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
#402
Mar 16, 2004
115,979
#402
X said:
the fundamental problem is that the govt is subservient to corporations and not the people, oh wait corps are people :sergoi:
Click to expand...
The problem is that people think government intervention in everything is going to help everything. But government intervention is synonymous with corporate fascism, therefore, the current government is a corporate fascist state.

This means that anybody in the US who demands the government to take control of everything is either an idiot or a fascist.

The government sets the base for the corruption to continue, the government creates the police state in the airports and streets, the government allows the borders to be wide open space. Corporations do not have the power to do anything unless the government allows it. Ipso facto, the government is the trojan horse and are at fault for our predicament.

I've come to the point where I could possibly think anarchy is a better solution than this. At least we would have savings from the tax reduction.
 
GordoDeCentral

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
#403
Apr 14, 2005
70,789
#403
Bjerknes said:
The problem is that people think government intervention in everything is going to help everything. But government intervention is synonymous with corporate fascism, therefore, the current government is a corporate fascist state.

This means that anybody in the US who demands the government to take control of everything is either an idiot or a fascist.

The government sets the base for the corruption to continue, the government creates the police state in the airports and streets, the government allows the borders to be wide open space. Corporations do not have the power to do anything unless the government allows it. Ipso facto, the government is the trojan horse and are at fault for our predicament.

I've come to the point where I could possibly think anarchy is a better solution than this. At least we would have savings from the tax reduction.
Click to expand...

:tup: i think it all started with the civil war
 
GordoDeCentral

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
#405
Apr 14, 2005
70,789
#405
nah lincoln was the first "bush", suspending constitutional rights and starting unconstitutional wars all in the name of noble principles, it also signaled the shift in power from the old money southern states to the new industrial northeast.

And FYI jefferson is the one who really set the tone with the trampling of the constitution with his louisiana purchase.
 
Bjerknes

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
#406
Mar 16, 2004
115,979
#406
X said:
nah lincoln was the first "bush", suspending constitutional rights and starting unconstitutional wars all in the name of noble principles, it also signaled the shift in power from the old money southern states to the new industrial northeast.

And FYI jefferson is the one who really set the tone with the trampling of the constitution with his louisiana purchase.
Click to expand...
I agree in regards Lincoln, good point. But Jefferson was totally anti-banker and warned against the Fed 100 years before it arrived. He was certainly a classical liberal.
 

Turk_Bianconero

Juventino
#412
Jul 2, 2006
19,433
#412
Zé Tahir said:
The person that has established himself as the Caliph of the Muslim ummah. The one that is the head of ISIS.

Who are you talking about?
Click to expand...
I know that but him declaring himself Caliph is ridiculous.

There will be an election for presidency of Turkiye. First time in the history, President will be directly elected by people. Insha'Allah it is gonna be Erdogan, only person who is holding such political influence and Islamic ideas in the region. That's him, i and most of the Muslims would call Caliph.
 
Trequartista

Trequartista

Fuoriclasse
#413
Jul 1, 2010
26,352
#413
Bjerknes said:
The problem is that people think government intervention in everything is going to help everything. But government intervention is synonymous with corporate fascism, therefore, the current government is a corporate fascist state.

This means that anybody in the US who demands the government to take control of everything is either an idiot or a fascist.

The government sets the base for the corruption to continue, the government creates the police state in the airports and streets, the government allows the borders to be wide open space. Corporations do not have the power to do anything unless the government allows it. Ipso facto, the government is the trojan horse and are at fault for our predicament.

I've come to the point where I could possibly think anarchy is a better solution than this. At least we would have savings from the tax reduction.
Click to expand...
To be honest I think that the USA is just too big to govern well. Decentralization is needed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)