Iraq. Is it better now?? (AKA ISIS/ISIL/IS/name-of-the-week-here) (10 Viewers)
- Thread starter ReBeL
- Start date
Noor Al Maliki should seriously resign.
He has taken too much advantage of Shi'aat sect for personal/Iranian interest, I don't see him less oppressive or cruel than Saddam Hussain in some way. He's applying the Iranian path political approach and he's basically doing their dirty work in too many cities.
He has taken too much advantage of Shi'aat sect for personal/Iranian interest, I don't see him less oppressive or cruel than Saddam Hussain in some way. He's applying the Iranian path political approach and he's basically doing their dirty work in too many cities.
ya what better rallying cry than the collective hate of a jewish cowboy
Looks like Walter White has entered Iraq...
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/19/w...f-saddam-hussein-crucial-in-helping-isis.html
Heads on turtles in two weeks fo sho.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/19/w...f-saddam-hussein-crucial-in-helping-isis.html
Heads on turtles in two weeks fo sho.
Maliki has treated his army the same way Saddam has which is one of the reasons Iraq is worse than ever. Saddam favored Sunni by handing them limitless power and positions from army to governments and now Maliki is no different by doing the same thing with Shi'aa claiming power and positions which is resulting into sectarian violence we are now seeing.
In Iraq it's the sects struggling for power and when a President favors his sect over the other than he is seeking blood maybe not as brutal as Saddam, but the result is one if you ask me.
As for Iran's role, I agree, and this is the sad part actually, they can calm things there as much as they can create chaos, that's what they have been doing for few years now alongside Bashar. No wonder why Al Qaeda/Da'ash/Nasra never made an attempt on Iran, not a single try actually, which makes me think that Iran somehow are also in-control of those groups some way.
In Iraq it's the sects struggling for power and when a President favors his sect over the other than he is seeking blood maybe not as brutal as Saddam, but the result is one if you ask me.
As for Iran's role, I agree, and this is the sad part actually, they can calm things there as much as they can create chaos, that's what they have been doing for few years now alongside Bashar. No wonder why Al Qaeda/Da'ash/Nasra never made an attempt on Iran, not a single try actually, which makes me think that Iran somehow are also in-control of those groups some way.
I doubt most people even know the actual rift between Sunni and Shia, including the Sunni's and Shia's themselves who raise arms against each other.
It's so freaking sad.
- - - Updated - - -
I hate it when the word "Islamic fundamentalism" is used...to me that refers to Muslims who follow the fundamentals. The Islam that Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban, Al Shabab, or whatever present is faaaaaaaaar from the fundamentals of Islam.
It's so freaking sad.
- - - Updated - - -
I hate it when the word "Islamic fundamentalism" is used...to me that refers to Muslims who follow the fundamentals. The Islam that Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban, Al Shabab, or whatever present is faaaaaaaaar from the fundamentals of Islam.
