Iraq. Is it better now?? (AKA ISIS/ISIL/IS/name-of-the-week-here) (17 Viewers)

Is Iraq better now?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
OP

ReBeL

The Jackal
Jan 14, 2005
22,871
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,222
    The initial result of American attacks, north of Syria last night, is killing 120 people; 70 of them in the areas controlled by IS, and 50 in the areas controlled by Nusra front. Many of them are civilians...
     

    Hust

    Senior Member
    Hustini
    May 29, 2005
    93,703
    The initial result of American attacks, north of Syria last night, is killing 120 people; 70 of them in the areas controlled by IS, and 50 in the areas controlled by Nusra front. Many of them are civilians...
    Alright. Well, we can sit back and let them slaughter you guys for all we care. Which would you rather want? LIve in the dark ages again with these monsters in charge or have someone try and clean house since apparently no one there wants to?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Tell you what Rebel, go ask ISIS to come out of the civilian web of innocent people and go fight man to man out in the field somewhere where innocent people don't get killed. Get pissed all you want at us Americans while these fools have NO PROBLEM hiding amongst innocent people. :tup:
     
    OP

    ReBeL

    The Jackal
    Jan 14, 2005
    22,871
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,225
    Alright. Well, we can sit back and let them slaughter you guys for all we care. Which would you rather want? LIve in the dark ages again with these monsters in charge or have someone try and clean house since apparently no one there wants to?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Tell you what Rebel, go ask ISIS to come out of the civilian web of innocent people and go fight man to man out in the field somewhere where innocent people don't get killed. Get pissed all you want at us Americans while these fools have NO PROBLEM hiding amongst innocent people. :tup:
    Again, I repeat American forces are not willing to clean this area from the main reasons of the instability which are Israel and the totalitarian regimes. Why should I support American forces in killing civilians in my region? Who called for the American interfering in the region initially?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Mahmoud Jumaa Muath, one of the terrorists killed by USA last night in the areas controlled by Nusra front with his mother...
     

    Attachments

    Hust

    Senior Member
    Hustini
    May 29, 2005
    93,703
    Again, I repeat American forces are not willing to clean this area from the main reasons of the instability which are Israel and the totalitarian regimes. Why should I support American forces in killing civilians in my region? Who called for the American interfering in the region initially?
    Repeat yourself all you like, I will do the same. No one there seems to have the balls to do anything about it, like I said, Id be more than happy to walk away and let you folks settle yourselves even if it takes you back half a millennia. Makes no difference to me. We have our own oil here, if that's where you want to take the argument.


    Totalitarian regimes? That's why we have things like the 2nd amendment because in the event anyone like Assad ever tried to take office you would see a citizenry fight back 100%. We don't see that there. But hey, if you guys are fine with people like Assad and ISIS doing as they wish then by God so are we.

    - - - Updated - - -

    The boy was a terrorist?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Feel free to post victims of ISIS too, Rebel. Let's keep it consistent. If US are the bad guys and ISIS are too, I'd be happy to see some of their vicitims. :tup:
     
    OP

    ReBeL

    The Jackal
    Jan 14, 2005
    22,871
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,227
    Repeat yourself all you like, I will do the same. No one there seems to have the balls to do anything about it, like I said, Id be more than happy to walk away and let you folks settle yourselves even if it takes you back half a millennia. Makes no difference to me. We have our own oil here, if that's where you want to take the argument.


    Totalitarian regimes? That's why we have things like the 2nd amendment because in the event anyone like Assad ever tried to take office you would see a citizenry fight back 100%. We don't see that there. But hey, if you guys are fine with people like Assad and ISIS doing as they wish then by God so are we.

    - - - Updated - - -

    The boy was a terrorist?
    We will be so happy seeing your forces leaving our shoulders for ever. Your forces are killing our civilians. They are not doing the world any better.

    Yes, the child is a terrorist according to the Pentagon's standards...
     

    Hust

    Senior Member
    Hustini
    May 29, 2005
    93,703
    I'd say that boy being in heaven now is in a much better place than he ever would have been alive, especially as things are developing. Hell, if he was raised a moderate there he probably would have been executed by ISIS.

    - - - Updated - - -

    OK, if that boy is a terrorist by Pentagon standards you are going to need to elaborate because I'm dying to see the spin you put on it.
     

    Hust

    Senior Member
    Hustini
    May 29, 2005
    93,703
    And you are still avoiding my point and I've acknowledged yours about us leaving...I'd love to. Now answer my damn question about who the hell is going to stand up to these idiots unless it's these idiots you support. If that's the case, then I can't take anything else you say seriously. And by idiots I mean ISIS.

    - - - Updated - - -

    He was not living in an area controlled by IS, by the way. Sad for you
    Again. How is he a terrorist by "pentagon standards"?

    - - - Updated - - -

    I'll organize this and make it easier for you to answer, Rebel:

    -Who will take initiative and fight the bad guys when (if) the US leaves (which I think we should leave 100%, for the record)?
    -How is that kid labeled a terrorist by pentagon standards?
    -Why is it OK for terrorists like ISIS to hide in a crowd and use the excuse that civilians are killed they are somehow martyrs when you know they are only using them as shields? How can they use religion as a reason to hide amongst them knowing that because of that then innocent lives will be killed when forces are trying to target the bad guys?
    -You can post a picture of a dead kid (civilian) but won't post pics of innocent life ISIS has taken. Why?
     

    Hust

    Senior Member
    Hustini
    May 29, 2005
    93,703
    Just for shits and giggles, requoting:

    "If you can kill a disbelieving American or European, especially the spiteful and filthy French, or an Australian, or a Canadian or any other disbeliever, then rely upon Allah, and kill him in any manner or way however it may be," an ISIS spokesman says.

    Yep. They are the "real" victims here, aren't they?

    US targets the bad guys trying to minimize collateral damage as much as we can while these guys try and convince the attack on innocent people but members here can just as easily post the pic of an innocent dead child as a result of an attack trying to kill terrorists but I don't see them posting pics of innocent people killed at the hands of their own fellow Muslims :tup:

    - - - Updated - - -

    The people of Heroshima tend to differ with you, Turk :)
    What about the people of Hiroshima*. That decision ended the war, saved probably more lives had the war gone on without that decision. Keep in mind, that was the country that got US involved in the war with its attack on Pearl Harbor. :tup:


    Ironically though, Japan and US have been great friends since. Oh please do continue this argument.
     
    Jul 2, 2006
    19,431
    Yeah, we enjoy killing innocent people, Turk. All of us Murican's are over here LoL'ing our little hearts out. :tup:
    Not you, your fucking freemason founding fathers and the ones following their steps. Yes, they enjoy people who are not their kind being killed. Forget about middle east for a minute. How many thousands did your government kill in south america with all of those staged coup d'etats.

    They don't even give flying fuck about their own citizens. Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, September 11... Should i go on?
     
    OP

    ReBeL

    The Jackal
    Jan 14, 2005
    22,871
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,236
    Just for $#@!s and giggles, requoting:




    Yep. They are the "real" victims here, aren't they?

    US targets the bad guys trying to minimize collateral damage as much as we can while these guys try and convince the attack on innocent people but members here can just as easily post the pic of an innocent dead child as a result of an attack trying to kill terrorists but I don't see them posting pics of innocent people killed at the hands of their own fellow Muslims :tup:

    - - - Updated - - -


    What about the people of Hiroshima*. That decision ended the war, saved probably more lives had the war gone on without that decision. Keep in mind, that was the country that got US involved in the war with its attack on Pearl Harbor. :tup:


    Ironically though, Japan and US have been great friends since. Oh please do continue this argument.
    Yeah, destroying a whole city was a very wise decision, and was not taken by cowards, for sure...
     

    Hust

    Senior Member
    Hustini
    May 29, 2005
    93,703
    Not you, your fucking freemason founding fathers and the ones following their steps. Yes, they enjoy people who are not their kind being killed. Forget about middle east for a minute. How many thousands did your government kill in south america with all of those staged coup d'etats.

    They don't even give flying fuck about their own citizens. Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, September 11... Should i go on?
    Wait, what? We entered a world war because our own people were attacked in cold blood at Pearl Harbor. 9/11 caused us to go into another war full fledge because innocent people were killed.


    yes, please do go on. IN the meantime I will wait for Rebel to answer my questions that he has yet to answer. And in the process I will wait for you to elaborate on how our gov doesn't care about our own people when THEY went to war because our innocent people were killed.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Yeah, destroying a whole city was a very wise decision, and was not taken by cowards, for sure...
    Cowards? Do you know how many of our soldiers were in the region for years battling japs hidding in bunkers? D-day? Yeah they were cowards trying to storm a beach with machine guns littering the hills just taking aim. Real cowardly :lol:

    - - - Updated - - -

    I wonder how many mods are monitoring this thread right now.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Andy is browsing...


    Please join in, bud.
     
    Jul 2, 2006
    19,431
    Wait, what? We entered a world war because our own people were attacked in cold blood at Pearl Harbor. 9/11 caused us to go into another war full fledge because innocent people were killed.


    yes, please do go on. IN the meantime I will wait for Rebel to answer my questions that he has yet to answer. And in the process I will wait for you to elaborate on how our gov doesn't care about our own people when THEY went to war because our innocent people were killed.
    Your government staged/ignored those attacks for profit. They are the epitome of evil, deal with it.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 16)