Not really, the ratings are credible and a good way to compare the performances if the number of games each player has playd are close to each other. The way you read those stats is also important. In Statistics, outliers must be excluded if you want to derive a sound interpretation. Amauri is an outlier [
] considering the number of games he has played.
Ratings of this season done by me and by you will almost surely be different, even if we're talking about ratings of Fiorentina players, not Juve players. Gazzetta in particular is regularly kind to serie A legends, especially if they're Italian.
Those particular ratings Pitbull was talking about were imo giving a wrong picture. Comparing Amauri's with Iaquinta's ratings (the ones who played less) shows that Amauri has been better than Iaquinta, which is not even worth discussing. Del Piero vs Quag is also wrong, imo. Even if Quag didn't have better or worse performances than Del Piero (which he didn't, I think), then only the number of goals they scored or assisted (7 vs 3) should have been enough for Quag to have better ratings.
