tbh i would take a shorter game over a longer one if it means better quality.
san andreas and 4 had quite a few filler missions that served nothing but to fill in time. 4 Especially had hose infuriating long drives from point A to be B then B to C.
V so far that i have played is more concentrated, which is great for me.
Skyrim was cool, played for at least 300/400 hours but it's very poor at storytelling. Witcher 3 has all the elements needed to be the best RPG in a long time.
Skyrim was cool, played for at least 300/400 hours but it's very poor at storytelling. Witcher 3 has all the elements needed to be the best RPG in a long time.
Am I the only that thought IV's story was more interesting than V's? Maybe it was lack the missions in V but IV felt more engaging and interesting. Might be nostalgia too.