Giuseppe Marotta (116 Viewers)

[Post Ironic]

It would be insane to pay 40 mil for him. Vidal sold for 40 mil and is a far superior player of the same age.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[lgorTudor]

I wonder if we approached United for Mata or City for Silva. Both probably impossible to carry salarywise yet we could see the initial ambition of the club.

 

[Bianconero81]

You know he's not worth 40 million, but paying that amount for him wouldn't be a bad deal.

Makes sense.

I am assuming you have never overpaid for anything in ur life

The amount was 25 million in cash; 40 million is assuming we value Sturaro @ 15 million. 22 Million + Sturaro for Hamsik isn't a horrible deal, is it?

 

[Hist]

Coman had his chances and he blew 'em away. I'm not saying he did bad, but he never lived up to be a starter and he didn't like being a sub for the time being. Juve did what they always do with players not wanting to play on. Also, a total of 28 million for him is a good deal for us, a gamble for Bayern.

Sturaro+25m adds up to almost 40m for Hamsik. I don't think Hamsik is worth that much money these days.

the 28 million deal is only an option for bayern after they have tested him around four 2 years. If he is shit then he'd cost them just the loan fee (6 mill) and whatever small salary he earns and if he is good they will get him for 22 million. They are not taking a risk almost at all. The only way we will have him back is if he turns out to be a poor player.

 

[j0ker]

In less that 3 months we have reduced the team's average age by 3 and a half years.

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

Great work TBH. Our average age was amongst the highest in the CL last season, now we are one of the youngest. It might be a bit of short-term pain for us, but for long-term gain. Had to be done.

 

[CAPITANO]

 

[Cheesio]

Damn, this picture have so much potentiel

 

[K.O.]

the 28 million deal is only an option for bayern after they have tested him around four 2 years. If he is $#@! then he'd cost them just the loan fee (6 mill) and whatever small salary he earns and if he is good they will get him for 22 million. They are not taking a risk almost at all. The only way we will have him back is if he turns out to be a poor player.

But isn't loaning out a 'shit' player for a total of 7 million is just brilliant business?

 

[da_ledgeaun]

Unable to see the pic Capt, do u have a new link?

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

Daydreaming of Diamanti

 

[CAPITANO]

Unable to see the pic Capt, do u have a new link?

http://i62.tinypic.com/25s1unr.jpg

 

[Buck Fuddy]

I am assuming you have never overpaid for anything in ur life

The amount was 25 million in cash; 40 million is assuming we value Sturaro @ 15 million. 22 Million + Sturaro for Hamsik isn't a horrible deal, is it?

The very definition of overpaying is not getting enough in return for your money. Which makes it a bad deal regardless of how you look at it.

Imo, 22 million + Sturaro for Hamsik is horrible.

 

[electricRoo]

Laurentis ask for Sturaro and Rugani.Or Sturaro plus 25 mil.

I would gladly have given them that. Why not? It's not like Sturaro is a great player or an important part of the team.

 

[Gerd]

The very definition of overpaying is not getting enough in return for your money. Which makes it a bad deal regardless of how you look at it.

Imo, 22 million + Sturaro for Hamsik is horrible.

Agree . We got sturaro for 8 mil iirc , he is worth 12-15 now Imho , that would make hamsik cost at least 30 , and they had the guts to also ask for rugani

 

[DUKAC]

Sturaro and 25 is too much.

 

[Xperd]

So many @lgorTudor's in here.Paying over the top sums for Hamsik..ugh

- - - Updated - - -

Dear @X, it was said in jest.I'm sure lgorTudor knows I'm not serious with him.

 

[Hist]

But isn't loaning out a '$#@!' player for a total of 7 million is just brilliant business?

it would be a small gain. Bayern stand to gain a lot if he is not a shit player

 

[Amer]

He said we had contacts for Hamsik a month ago and nobody knew about it.

He also said Schalke was imposible to deal with.

 

[GarfielD]

Marotta on the mercato:

"We received offers of up to 100m for Pogba, but we resisted. Juventus wants to win and that's why we decided to keep Pogba- If Pogba maintains the performance of last year, then 100m maybe not enough.

We were on Hamsik track for more than a month, we spoke to De Laurentiis more than 10 times. He was a player who fit the bill, and if you want to win in Italy you need those players.

The oscar of the mercato I willingly give it to Inter, but they have to confirm it on the field.

On Draxler I already said there were objective difficulties, Schalke's a mysterious team. We lacked fluidity of dialogue with them. The demands, in our opinion, were disproportionate. I also believe the player had some concerns that affected the deal.

Mercato regrets? There are some names that aren't even talked about."