it is funny how the clueless around here rotate in their cries for something we (allegedly) currently don't have. after trezeguets exit everybody claimed "we need a poacher, someone who has goal instinct", after that it was "we need more creativity", then "we need more width" and now it is "we need the top striker". these are just empty words. we have the best "attack" so what do you think would have changed if we had that "wonder striker" ? would we have the uber-best attack ? we do score enough goals. if scoring 23 times in 11 games is not enough for you this season then you clearly do not understand football. in champions league we scored 4 goals in 3 games, so that ain't enough either, right ? what buggy kind of version of football manager do you guys play, that makes your team instantly score whenever you need it, by changing a striker. this is what you have to have in mind.
we will not ADD a striker, we will simply have to bench giovinco or vucinic and add another guy who hopefully will be THAT MUCH better, so that we do not only score as much as with Giovinco but even more and at the same time do not lose any of the characteristics Giovinco gives our game. i do not see the player that would give us this quality jump right now. if we get david villa and we play vucinic and him togethers you moaners will switch to your old broken record of "we need more creativity" when vuvcinic has one of his several "couldn't care less"-days.